HerrLjunga
Vital 1st Team Regular
He's saying this now...I'd rather go for the former with a good number of the latter thrown in.
A clear back me or sack me statement, as if BG needed telling.
The problem is that he is being shrewd. Wants a payoff rather than walk.W
If he wanted to retain a shrewd of dignity, he’d walk.
Given that tweet I find it highly unlikely that he would come in to replace the man he considers his mate.Wasn't Bircham at our games after Evans was sacked and before Harris got the job? Regardless of that he posted this on twitter earlier so it would be quite something if he got the job in the next week or so.
The problem is that he is being shrewd. Wants a payoff rather than walk.
(Sorry to take advantage of your typo. Plenty to come from me, I'm sure)
An ace new manager? Any names?My view is that Harris should be sacked immediately - he deserves to be. That gives us almost two weeks to use our money and get an ace new manager in for the important game v Hartlepools. If we have all these funds touted for a revamp of our team, then we should have a good kitty for a new manager, which is more important than any other signing.
An ace new manager? Any names?
Easy to be fast and loose with BG's funding but there will be a limit and after paying off Harris and Livermore and paying enough to recruit this ace manager and his staff, hopefully there is enough for a team of ace players, unless you are still certain we already have some, which you have commented before.
When I say "ace" I mean in comparison to Harris. I know, for you, those of you who adore him and he can do no wrong, despite us being rock bottom of an awful League 2 having played in League One for over a decade, having scored 7 goals all season, ace would mean recruiting a Klopp or Guardiola. However, for me, after Harris's failure, an ace manager is merely someone who is experience and competent at this level, can keep us up and get is promoted next season. Not a lot to ask given the statements coming from the new owner. The players we have are not good enough, but most of them were signed by Harris and, in my opinion, they are still better than bottom of a terrible league - it's the man who coaches and motivates them that are the problem, which isn't to say that a number of them should not be replaced by "ace" players at this level.
So no names, then?
Or are we back to just "anyone but"? (Harris, Hess, Taylor, Lovell, uncle Tom Cobley and all)
Strange how fans always claim to know better than any manager, and know who they don't want, but are unable to suggest a better one with a better previous record than Harris when he was appointed.
Always simple when you do not have the money or responsibility.
So no names, then?
Or are we back to just "anyone but"? (Harris, Hess, Taylor, Lovell, uncle Tom Cobley and all)
Strange how fans always claim to know better than any manager, and know who they don't want, but are unable to suggest a better one with a better previous record than Harris when he was appointed.
Always simple when you do not have the money or responsibility.
So no names, then?
Or are we back to just "anyone but"? (Harris, Hess, Taylor, Lovell, uncle Tom Cobley and all)
Strange how fans always claim to know better than any manager, and know who they don't want, but are unable to suggest a better one with a better previous record than Harris when he was appointed.
Always simple when you do not have the money or responsibility.
So no names, then?
Or are we back to just "anyone but"? (Harris, Hess, Taylor, Lovell, uncle Tom Cobley and all)
Strange how fans always claim to know better than any manager, and know who they don't want, but are unable to suggest a better one.
So no names, then?
Or are we back to just "anyone but"? (Harris, Hess, Taylor, Lovell, uncle Tom Cobley and all)
Strange how fans always claim to know better than any manager, and know who they don't want, but are unable to suggest a better one with a better previous record than Harris when he was appointed.
Always simple when you do not have the money or responsibility.