Frank Bullitt
Vital Squad Member
The ref only gets to see the incident in live play and make a instant decision.Speak for yourself.
The ref only gets to see the incident in live play and make a instant decision.Speak for yourself.
The ref only gets to see the incident in live play and make a instant decision.
And what a shit decision it was.The ref only gets to see the incident in live play and make a instant decision.
To be fair, he made a couple of runs in that game ... nowt spectacular, but better than today.He was crap on Wednesday moonay, like today he did nothing, he miss hit/scuffed his shot for his goal, that is the only reason it went in.
The wrong oneThe ref only gets to see the incident in live play and make a instant decision.
So, whatever, you've decided he is useless after two performances! Doesn't say a lot for our recruitment department then. Perhaps you should apply to join them then we won't sign such dreadful players in the future!!!He was crap on Wednesday moonay, like today he did nothing, he miss hit/scuffed his shot for his goal, that is the only reason it went in.
I agree and I also thought the same, unfortunatetly the ref didnt agree with us.So did I Frank and as I said at the time I couldn't see anything wrong with it, the keeper had actually lost the ball before crashing into Charlie.
So if the ref had given the goal and later we found that it was a foul the Lincoln fans would no doubt be having this conversation.And what a shit decision it was.
Maybe not ... but he didn't. He made the mistake, ... and it went against us. Not sure why you bring in the ifs and buts.So if the ref had given the goal and later we found that it was a foul the Lincoln fans would no doubt be having this conversation.
Which is (perhaps) a reason for extending VAR to all leagues. Don't know how they would do it, but a quick review of the video today and the ref would have reversed his erroneous decision!So if the ref had given the goal and later we found that it was a foul the Lincoln fans would no doubt be having this conversation.
Which is (perhaps) a reason for extending VAR to all leagues. Don't know how they would do it, but a quick review of the video today and the ref would have reversed his erroneous decision!
Right or wrong the ref is in charge and he ruled it as a foul.Maybe not ... but he didn't. He made the mistake, ... and it went against us. Not sure why you bring in the ifs and buts.
We'd be in League 2 already with that rule.having a point deducted for the lack of entertainment would have been fairer.
No no no no no no no. We've had loads of incidents this season that might have been turned around by VAR, but still ... NO !!!Which is (perhaps) a reason for extending VAR to all leagues. Don't know how they would do it, but a quick review of the video today and the ref would have reversed his erroneous decision!
Lincoln fans would have nothing to discuss....it wasn't a foul and it was a fair goal.So if the ref had given the goal and later we found that it was a foul the Lincoln fans would no doubt be having this conversation.
You talk shite St C, he passed it in with his right foot I was there, and ripping a player who had been out 12 weeks and coming back and scores on his 2nd game needs a chance to prove himself even as a sub.He was crap on Wednesday moonay, like today he did nothing, he miss hit/scuffed his shot for his goal, that is the only reason it went in.
The point is no one was sure really until we saw the above footage and had a second chance to review it.Lincoln fans would have nothing to discuss....it wasn't a foul and it was a fair goal.