Do you deliberately only half-read or mis-read stuff?
Firstly, please show where I've argued against what's in your first sentence. (Well, up until the first comma, as in effect, the whole paragraph is one long sentence!).
Secondly, the manager presumably played a part in motivating the players to do well in the "big games", so he's not completely bereft of them.
Thirdly, why aren't you happy that I'm simply apportioning blame between the players AND the manager. I'm not giving the manager a free pass ... of course he owns the recent performances ... but so do the players.
As for Gary Monk, surely it's exactly the same as us being up for it against Bolton, Blackpool, Derby, etc.