Layton_Seasider
Vital Football Hero
From an absolutist position some things are right, wrong, good, bad, legal or illegal. This theory derives from a widespread opinion, although not unanimous, as to what is socially acceptable - you can conform or deviate!!!
When studying people sociologically the accepted and established norms when challenged to extremes can be seen as a stimulant for social change. It can also act as a reaffirmation as to what is the norm.
So we tend to look at things as percentages as to what is socially acceptable and what makes for a deviant. From my personal recollections of my Sociology studies a figure of 13.6% is a recurring number. I am not trying to prove conclusively that the sums add up or that my theory is correct beyond doubt but merely hoping to stimulate thoughts and to show that them now commonly termed as “mushrooms” are in fact social deviants.
Just 5 years ago Blackpool FC had average attendances of 15,775. This was at a time when the club was functioning ‘normally’ as a community asset and before the sociopathic owners had started their spiteful campaign of legal actions against ‘normal’ fans. With that figure, 13.6%, in mind it is easy to draw assumptions that this figure is indeed a pivotal number in ascertaining that 136 people per 1,000, the deviant minority, are a representative group when it comes to other deviant behaviours, sexual predators, criminals and mentally ill all fall into a quotient that is closest to this number!
So for my theory to hold any credence the attendance figure for Oystain FC would now have to be circa 2,145. Take away the free tickets and the spin generated by the sociopaths and I would bet my left nut that this figure is almost exactly correct?
Layton is clever, Layton is #NAPM, Layton is not a deviant, be like Layton!
When studying people sociologically the accepted and established norms when challenged to extremes can be seen as a stimulant for social change. It can also act as a reaffirmation as to what is the norm.
So we tend to look at things as percentages as to what is socially acceptable and what makes for a deviant. From my personal recollections of my Sociology studies a figure of 13.6% is a recurring number. I am not trying to prove conclusively that the sums add up or that my theory is correct beyond doubt but merely hoping to stimulate thoughts and to show that them now commonly termed as “mushrooms” are in fact social deviants.
Just 5 years ago Blackpool FC had average attendances of 15,775. This was at a time when the club was functioning ‘normally’ as a community asset and before the sociopathic owners had started their spiteful campaign of legal actions against ‘normal’ fans. With that figure, 13.6%, in mind it is easy to draw assumptions that this figure is indeed a pivotal number in ascertaining that 136 people per 1,000, the deviant minority, are a representative group when it comes to other deviant behaviours, sexual predators, criminals and mentally ill all fall into a quotient that is closest to this number!
So for my theory to hold any credence the attendance figure for Oystain FC would now have to be circa 2,145. Take away the free tickets and the spin generated by the sociopaths and I would bet my left nut that this figure is almost exactly correct?
Layton is clever, Layton is #NAPM, Layton is not a deviant, be like Layton!
