Monday Morning Takeaway | Page 2 | Vital Football

Monday Morning Takeaway

premier 1 - 6/3/2018 14:15

whitey1942 - 6/3/2018 11:01

The Bailiffs should take Premier 1 along with OO's other favourites, after all the former councillor has been defending the scarecrow's illicit actions for years.
I have never defended any illicit actions from anyone.
I await your apology .

You have defended the Os all along the line whilst at the same time opposing those who chose to fight the good fight so there will be no apology.
If I and others were to trawl through the catalogue of Premier 1 postings which at the time, not only supported their actions but also on many occasions went on to justify them, you would be very embarrassed indeed...Think about it!
 
whitey1942 - 6/3/2018 16:08

premier 1 - 6/3/2018 14:15

whitey1942 - 6/3/2018 11:01

The Bailiffs should take Premier 1 along with OO's other favourites, after all the former councillor has been defending the scarecrow's illicit actions for years.
I have never defended any illicit actions from anyone.
I await your apology .

You have defended the Os all along the line whilst at the same time opposing those who chose to fight the good fight so there will be no apology.
If I and others were to trawl through the catalogue of Premier 1 postings which at the time, not only supported their actions but also on many occasions went on to justify them, you would be very embarrassed indeed...Think about it!
I have never supported illicit actions .I await your retraction.
:anger:
 
premier 1 - 6/3/2018 16:42

whitey1942 - 6/3/2018 16:08

premier 1 - 6/3/2018 14:15

whitey1942 - 6/3/2018 11:01

The Bailiffs should take Premier 1 along with OO's other favourites, after all the former councillor has been defending the scarecrow's illicit actions for years.
I have never defended any illicit actions from anyone.
I await your apology .

You have defended the Os all along the line whilst at the same time opposing those who chose to fight the good fight so there will be no apology.
If I and others were to trawl through the catalogue of Premier 1 postings which at the time, not only supported their actions but also on many occasions went on to justify them, you would be very embarrassed indeed...Think about it!
I have never supported illicit actions .I await your retraction.
:anger:

You try to justify your stance by not acknowledging certain actions as illicit. Many of your posts prove this to be the case so nothing to retract.
 
Bear1951 - 6/3/2018 16:48

But did you think it was legally admissible for Owen to take that 11 million "bonus"?

Teddy, am I missing something? Have I missed Premier 1's answer to your question?
 
whitey1942 - 6/3/2018 16:08

premier 1 - 6/3/2018 14:15

whitey1942 - 6/3/2018 11:01

The Bailiffs should take Premier 1 along with OO's other favourites, after all the former councillor has been defending the scarecrow's illicit actions for years.
I have never defended any illicit actions from anyone.
I await your apology .

You have defended the Os all along the line whilst at the same time opposing those who chose to fight the good fight so there will be no apology.
If I and others were to trawl through the catalogue of Premier 1 postings which at the time, not only supported their actions but also on many occasions went on to justify them, you would be very embarrassed indeed...Think about it!


Correct Whitey. I can remember quite clearly going back years, the nature of prem's posts and how he defended the O's. Thing is , he chooses to forget ! :lash:
 
whitey1942 - 6/3/2018 16:58

Bear1951 - 6/3/2018 16:48

But did you think it was legally admissible for Owen to take that 11 million "bonus"?

Teddy, am I missing something? Have I missed Premier 1's answer to your question?

Funnily enough I can't find it either Whitey. :grins:
 
EXCLUSIVE: Owen Oyston spectacularly claims legal enforcement action was ‘unlawful’ and has filed for damages

From Mat at the Gazette
 
SaskPool - 7/3/2018 21:36

EXCLUSIVE: Owen Oyston spectacularly claims legal enforcement action was ‘unlawful’ and has filed for damages

From Mat at the Gazette

The man is a complete and utter fool! He must just love going to court.
 
I'm hoping that the judge in the original case loses his rag and gets VB to go for the club, which is looking like the only way VB is going to get anything anywhere near to the full ammount awarded to him.

Blackpool Football Club owner Owen Oyston has spectacularly claimed Monday’s legal enforcement action was “unlawful” and has issued a claim for damages.

Valeri Belokon, who is still owed in the region of £25m following November’s High Court judgement, sent in the bailiffs to Bloomfield Road on Monday to crank up the pressure on the Oystons. Having missed January’s deadline to pay a second installment of £10m, Oyston was told in no uncertain terms by a High Court judge that he must pay up immediately or face the consequences of enforcement action being taken to make him sell his assets. But, in a statement issued through his representatives, Oyston has claimed the action was unlawful and has obtained an interim injunction from the High Court.

The statement read: “Mr Oyston was informed by his legal advisers that the action undertaken by the High Court enforcement officers was unlawful

“As a result, Mr Oyston has instructed his legal team who have issued a claim for a final injunction and damages. “That claim was issued in the High Court this morning.

“In the meantime, Mr Oyston has obtained an interim injunction restraining the High Court enforcement officers from unlawful enforcement pending a further hearing. “Mr Oyston will not make any further comment at this time.” Just before lunchtime on Monday, two vans, four bailiffs and representatives from Belokon’s lawyers Clifford Chance were sent to the Blackpool Football Club Hotel, where Owen Oyston’s offices are based. Having spent around two hours inside the stadium, where it is understood they sifted through a list of goods, properties and deeds, the bailiffs then travelled to Oyston’s Quernmore Park Hall, a country house based in Lancaster.

Despite being momentarily delayed by a locked main entrance, the bailiffs spent the majority of the afternoon on the 20-acre estate. Clifford Chance confirmed to The Gazette that Belokon is “continuing to take steps to enforce the payment of the judgment debt that is owed to him”. They also made it clear Belokon was not out to harm the football club and the action was solely being taken against Owen Oyston as an individual.

Last month, it was found Oyston had failed to progress the sale of assets, which had prejudiced Mr Belokon, and the Court of Appeal had dismissed his application to overturn the original court judgement from last November. The Oystons were ordered to buy out former director Belokon for £31.27m back in November after it was found they had illegitimately stripped the club of cash following promotion to the Premier League in 2010.

The judge found Belokon had been unfairly prejudiced and the club was put up for sale four days later. Representatives for Valeri Belokon have been contacted for comment.