That's like saying XXX are owned by an Italian so they must be about to sack their manager just as Leeds kept doingI'm guessing the contract was authorised by IEC but if they see us getting sucked into a relegation battle then they may get twitchy with their lack of experience. Forgive me if I'm wrong but aren't Birmingham owned by a Hong Kong consortium and are they the ones that sacked Rowett when they were in the play offs?
Looks to me like Brighton inserted an appearance clause in that loan back of Burn. Kipre and Dunks were forming a good partnership, no need to tinker with it.I think his heart is in it but subconsciously maybe you have a point. I like Burn but by God he looks far from a PL central defender at present.
That's like saying XXX are owned by an Italian so they must be about to sack their manager just as Leeds kept doing
No.
Sacking Cook would be a cataclysmically terrible decision of Warren Joyce proportions.
What about replacing cook with Joyce? Could it get any worse?No.
Sacking Cook would be a cataclysmically terrible decision of Warren Joyce proportions.
What about replacing cook with Joyce? Could it get any worse?
If you saw Dunkley's legs yesterday in the warm-up he had strapping on them, plus he had a poor game against SU. May have been carrying a slight injury that required him being rested and only used in emergencies. Maybe not, but just a point that I sawI think Burn can get better as he settles back in but I thought it was a mistake to bring him back in and break up Dunkley and Kipre. At the moment i dont think he'd be that big of a loss in January.
We are seeing the trend of football at this level is changing and centre halfs requirements are evolving. I'm not sure if Burn is suited to playing that higher line against more skillful and faster players who are going short rather than for aerial duels.
If you saw Dunkley's legs yesterday in the warm-up he had strapping on them, plus he had a poor game against SU. May have been carrying a slight injury that required him being rested and only used in emergencies. Maybe not, but just a point that I saw
What about replacing cook with Joyce? Could it get any worse?
Dunkelys has had both hamstrings taped all season so there is a good shout that he maybe was carrying a knock - but if that was the case I'd think he'd not be on the bench.
It does beg the question though do we have some type of issue that is causing so many hamstrings to go? Massey, Jacobs, Grigg, Roberts all out with hamstrings - not sure what it is with Powell at the moment but he's always had issues with his hamstrings, both of Dunkleys are taped up every game. Not sure if maybe there is something with the warm ups and training that is causing it or just a crazy bad coincidence but when you have so many in quick succession it does suggest there could be some underlying problem somewhere.
Unless Cook has completely altered his training methods for some odd reason, Ii think we've just been very unlucky. I don't know what the injury situation was at his previous clubs, but there was no inkling of these kind of injuries last season.
As Pep Guardiola said to his players in the All or Nothing documentary...”of course I’m going to defend you until the last day of our lives in the press conference. But here, I’m going to tell you the truth!”In the run up to the game Sky reported that Dunkley was being rested due to a slight injury and being replaced with Kipre.
As far as the under pressure question goes, I must admit it seems he is, his after game interview was unbelievable. I don't think he was watching the same game as me. To say that the players gave everything on the pitch goes I suggest he watches the Windass break from their corner. He is one on one yet six other players get back to defend without a single latics player even trying to get up with him. Gave everything on the pitch, give us a break.