I had an understanding of what I am here to do, I didn’t promise that I would make us play like Manchester City or Liverpool, but I did believe I could get us to create more chances and I think I have stuck to my word on that.
I had a look at the numbers broadly to see whether this is the case or just wishful thinking. For me, the eye test shows us having more attacking threat when I've seen us, but perhaps not the revolution we need.
Clemence took over in November and had his first game against Salford.
Before his arrival, we averaged
11.3 shots per game, with
3.8 shots on target.
After his arrival (23 league games) we now average
13.4 shots per game, with
3.7 on target. A slight upward trend in chance creation, which confirms his view.
Interestingly, our G/PG number has actually dipped slightly, from 0.97 to 0.87 during that span.
For reference, Mansfield lead L2 with an average of 18.2 shots per game, with Harrogate the lowest at 9.79, placing Gills around the centre of the pack in shots per 90. Probably not going to get you promotion unless your strike force is clinical, but certainly not likely to make you the lowest scorers in the table (36 in 38 games is pretty dismal)
What I do find interesting:
* Gillingham have the second lowest shots on target % in the league (30.2%) suggesting that the shots we take aren't good enough.
* Our goals per shot are 0.07 which is joint lowest in L2, as is our goals per shot on target, at 0.23.
This would all suggest that while we can create chances and have improved this slightly under Clem, we're still not good at a) getting them on target consistently and b) when we do, they're not good enough to go in.
I feel for the guy. Ultimately we need better forwards and yes, at the risk of sounding like a record stuck in a groove, that's on our recruitment department