tomytony
Vital Champions League
To an extent they do, in some cases explain why decisions were made, online. Although I admit it's not widely publicised.
The Premier League website attempts to explain why Egan was sent off at Villa whilst there was only a yellow card in the penalty where Basham was fouled; https://www.premierleague.com/news/1840580
Same here, they explain how off-sides are determined by VAR, using Lundstram at Tottenham last season as a prime example; https://www.premierleague.com/news/1488423
They should have to explain, in person, straight after the game. As you say, those explanations are well hidden, and given after having an age to consider the response and when the heat has died down.Making them appear live would sharpen them up,focus their attention on getting it right or have to come out and admit, even with all the technology available, they got it wrong.
No one likes admitting they got it wrong so it would also make them more conscious of the need to perform better. Serial offenders would soon be sifted out.
Remember, some of those decisions can be multi million pound ones, the sort something with that sort of authority and influence would be sacked for in other spheres of life.
To sharpen them up further,and to gain wider acceptance and understanding, all VAR communications should be broadcast live so that fans, both in the stadium, and on TV can see the reasoning and understand the process better. After all , if you're confident of your decision, you should be confident enough to back it up.
I realise I am taking a fairly extreme position but that serves only to display my absolute dismay and disappointment at the sham officiating we are saddled with now .
As I said above, if the aim is 100% accuracy , a level playing field, the eradication of error then you have to find ways to make that work.
Otherwise accept the mistakes and scrap it- no one ever got anywhere by accepting and condoning mediocrity.