HIGHLIGHTS: Cheltenham Town 1-0 Lincoln City

[Jules]

[youtube=xftUsdqJS4I]

 

[berksimps]

Unsurprisingly no highlights for us in the first half.

 

[Scotimp]

Should Vickers have stopped that? Very, very soft.

 

[Davidimp]

Should someone have got a block or tackle in before he had the shot?

 

[Stevie_imp]

Vickers should IMHO have stopped it as although well placed it was under hit. He made some other good saves though. Their keeper make some very good saves.

 

[Imprest 1]

At first blush as I watched yesterday, I thought it was just a soft goal. Watching it again a few times, I don't think I could blame Vickers. Their guy took it down at the edge of the area, bit of nifty footwork and he fired through the defenders legs, although underhit it had just enough on it to trickle in at the foot of the post.
I think it was more a case of him being unsighted, should someone have got a foot in? Possibly!

 

[PerthImp]

I reckon it wasnt so much down to Vickers as Woodyard Raggett & Dickie who were all around him and none of them got a block in. Cest la vie - one of those games.

 

[cdhIMP]

Not too happy that there’s no coverage of the penalty incident on Raggett.

 

[Jules]

Davidimp - 22/10/2017 13:12

Should someone have got a block or tackle in before he had the shot?

Yes. It was extremely poor defending.

 

[The Electric Banana]

Scotimp - 22/10/2017 13:03

Should Vickers have stopped that? Very, very soft.

My thoughts too.