FACT : I used to live next door to Mark from D:Ream... bit of a bell end.
FACT : I used to live next door to Mark from D:Ream... bit of a bell end.
Do they really?
And when I say that, I mean, do they actually?
Do they really?
And when I say that, I mean, do they actually?
Can't see any more recent articles, but this is from 2015
Non-doms in numbers: how 115,000 non-doms pay as much tax as 10 million low-income workers
At the same time, the amount of money raised by HMRC from non-doms has increased - from £5.9 billion in 2008-09 to £8.2 billion in 2012-13.
Non-doms in numbers: how 115,000 non-doms pay as much tax as 10 million low-income workers
All you need to know about non-doms and their tax payments, in four easy chartswww.telegraph.co.uk
Fair play to you for doing your research.Newer figures from Bloomberg
The changes are intended to raise £2.7 billion ($3.4 billion) in tax per year by 2028-29, in addition to the £8.5 billion that non-doms currently pay in various UK taxes each year.
End of UK’s Non-Dom Tax Break Unsettles Wealthiest Residents
The UK is overhauling its system of preferential tax treatment for wealthy foreigners, creating revenue for the government to spend on British voters at the expense of agitating some of the nation’s richest residents.www.bloomberg.com
The distinction , I believe, is that this applies to new non doms rather than existing/ there is a time period applied . I will review this furtherFurther than what Toms?
The abolition of non-dom status that the Tories have already stolen from Labour policy?
Did you laugh when you were typing that bit about them taking "their tax take with them"?
I laughed when I read it. Good work Toms
They also pay SDLT on expensive property purchases , VAT on luxury items.Do they really?
And when I say that, I mean, do they actually?
Does the 2.7bn estimate of additional income include expected losses from the minority that might actually leave our shores?
Presumably it does so we will be net winners.
I agree with almost all you have said except for the ideologically correct part. It’s not imo. It’s merely class warfare . When many middle class parents leave the private sector the net effect will be minimal. What will happen is that English parents will flood the state system , most likely grammar schools. They will become a burden to the state rather than a benefit.I doubt it very much. All the parties are as bad, but I would be pretty sure that Labour will have made the figure as large as possible. Do any of these people EVER publish their workings, along with the assumptions they have made ?
Similarly with their plans on education. Ideologically they are correct, except it won't affect the rich at all. They will easily afford the increases, or send their kids abroad to be educated. It will only affect the middle and working classes. Will Labour publish how many children will need to leave Private Education and move into State Education before it costs the taxpayers money, and the same with the one off taxes on energy companies. The worst of it is the Tories have jumped on many of these ideas too.
They do submit these figures usually to the OBR.I doubt it very much. All the parties are as bad, but I would be pretty sure that Labour will have made the figure as large as possible. Do any of these people EVER publish their workings, along with the assumptions they have made ?
Similarly with their plans on education. Ideologically they are correct, except it won't affect the rich at all. They will easily afford the increases, or send their kids abroad to be educated. It will only affect the middle and working classes. Will Labour publish how many children will need to leave Private Education and move into State Education before it costs the taxpayers money, and the same with the one off taxes on energy companies. The worst of it is the Tories have jumped on many of these ideas too.
Maybe the conservatives should have thought about protecting the middle class then and raising the 40p thresholds?I agree with almost all you have said except for the ideologically correct part. It’s not imo. It’s merely class warfare . When many middle class parents leave the private sector the net effect will be minimal. What will happen is that English parents will flood the state system , most likely grammar schools. They will become a burden to the state rather than a benefit.
There should be no vat on education or health choices .
The thresholds are required to pay down debt caused by wars and Covid. If you raise the thresholds you reduce the tax take for public services and debt payment. There are no easy solutions .Maybe the conservatives should have thought about protecting the middle class then and raising the 40p thresholds?
After all, that is what is choking middle class taxpayers. Brought in by one of the many recent chancellors and confirmed by all since.
The taper between 100k-130k is insane and was brought in by Osborne. As is the child benefit charge, brought in by Osborne.
Had the 40p thresholds risen to more more like 70k as it should have by now, and the 100k tax trap been sorted, then middle class parents would easily be able to afford VAT on private schools and Labour wouldn't mess with it as they don't like messing with income tax
And brexitThe thresholds are required to pay down debt caused by wars and Covid. If you raise the thresholds you reduce the tax take for public services and debt payment. There are no easy solutions .
I agree with the 100k-120 k thing. There are many things that have been done which don’t represent true conservatism in the last few years but I can only vote for a party who isn’t totally going to screw my family.
VAT on private schools and abolishing Non dom status are required to pay down debt caused by wars and COVID.The thresholds are required to pay down debt caused by wars and Covid. If you raise the thresholds you reduce the tax take for public services and debt payment. There are no easy solutions .
I agree with the 100k-120 k thing. There are many things that have been done which don’t represent true conservatism in the last few years but I can only vote for a party who isn’t totally going to screw my family.
You couldn't make it upVAT on private schools and abolishing Non dom status are required to pay down debt caused by wars and COVID.
They do submit these figures usually to the OBR.
How are labour supposed to accurately calculate how many children are going to leave private education as a result?
That would require reading the future.
You would need to know:
a) What proportion of private schools would pass the whole increase on rather than absorb some of it to avoid losing customers
b) guess how many would not be able to afford these unknown figures
c) know how many would put their children in state schools rather than sourcing cheaper private
What we do know is that private school fees have increased exponentially under this Tory Government; I quoted the figure from Paul Johnson a few weeks ago on here. I can't remember but it was a significant increase- more than 20%.
The last time that state schools had a big influx from private was 2008. The state sector coped just fine because it was being properly funded
Nope neither will bring a meaningful net gain and are accordingly nothing but political ideological claptrapVAT on private schools and abolishing Non dom status are required to pay down debt caused by wars and COVID.