Chelsea v Forest match thread sponsored by Vatican Holidays! | Page 5 | Vital Football

Chelsea v Forest match thread sponsored by Vatican Holidays!

Mozzer1 - 20/9/2017 21:04

Future requirements?? Like 3 defenders and a keeper he should of got in the window
Click to expand...

Not forgetting a couple of midfielders and a right winger would've been nice as well.
 
fumanchew - 20/9/2017 20:56

Also for those that didn't see Chelsea's starting line up cost 169m ours cost 3m...

(Edit to add...)

They're not just 'kids' at Chelsea really are they
Click to expand...

I had it just over £200,000,000 with 2 undisclosed fees on top of that but you're probably right as I only checked via wikipedia.

They have another £100,000,000 odd on the bench.

Most of our lot cost us nothing.

Tonight is no reflection on where we are as a CHampionship team, they will knock 4, 5 and 5 past better teams than us this season. Don't understand the hysteria - in fact I think it's absoultely bonkers - but maybe I'm slow on the uptake?

Got to stay positive.
 
I think the settled back 5 of smith traore worrall mills darikwa wouldn't have fared as bad.

Nice to see brereton running at their players, we need more belief in that respect
 
Practically everytime they hit the target...it went in...i m guessing even possession we werent far from them...its what to do with thr ball that matters...
 
Forest Boffin - 20/9/2017 21:11

fumanchew - 20/9/2017 20:56

Also for those that didn't see Chelsea's starting line up cost 169m ours cost 3m...

(Edit to add...)

They're not just 'kids' at Chelsea really are they
Click to expand...

I had it just over £200,000,000 with 2 undisclosed fees on top of that but you're probably right as I only checked via wikipedia.

They have another £100,000,000 odd on the bench.

Most of our lot cost us nothing.

Tonight is no reflection on where we are as a CHampionship team, they will knock 4, 5 and 5 past better teams than us this season. Don't understand the hysteria - in fact I think it's absoultely bonkers - but maybe I'm slow on the uptake?

Got to stay positive.
Click to expand...

Saw a tweet from BBC nottingham
Sport so not sure where they had their information from
 
Forest Boffin - 20/9/2017 21:11

fumanchew - 20/9/2017 20:56

Also for those that didn't see Chelsea's starting line up cost 169m ours cost 3m...

(Edit to add...)

They're not just 'kids' at Chelsea really are they
Click to expand...

I had it just over £200,000,000 with 2 undisclosed fees on top of that but you're probably right as I only checked via wikipedia.

They have another £100,000,000 odd on the bench.

Most of our lot cost us nothing.

Tonight is no reflection on where we are as a CHampionship team, they will knock 4, 5 and 5 past better teams than us this season. Don't understand the hysteria - in fact I think it's absoultely bonkers - but maybe I'm slow on the uptake?

Got to stay positive.
Click to expand...

So, that's 300 million vs 3 million?

Are Chelsea a 100 times better? I'd expect them to be in double figures for 300 million.

5-0? *Shrugs.

We're in the Championship. They're in the Premiership which pulled up the financial ladder and 'fairness' long ago.

Boffin, I like your posts.

SA.
 
Forest Boffin - 20/9/2017 22:11

Tonight is no reflection on where we are as a CHampionship team, they will knock 4, 5 and 5 past better teams than us this season. Don't understand the hysteria - in fact I think it's absoultely bonkers - but maybe I'm slow on the uptake?

Got to stay positive.
Click to expand...

:19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19: :19:
 
MaltaRed - 20/9/2017 21:19

Practically everytime they hit the target...it went in...i m guessing even possession we werent far from them...its what to do with thr ball that matters...
Click to expand...

Most of them went through the keeper
 
Strawberry Avenger - 20/9/2017 21:20

Forest Boffin - 20/9/2017 21:11

fumanchew - 20/9/2017 20:56

Also for those that didn't see Chelsea's starting line up cost 169m ours cost 3m...

(Edit to add...)

They're not just 'kids' at Chelsea really are they
Click to expand...

I had it just over £200,000,000 with 2 undisclosed fees on top of that but you're probably right as I only checked via wikipedia.

They have another £100,000,000 odd on the bench.

Most of our lot cost us nothing.

Tonight is no reflection on where we are as a CHampionship team, they will knock 4, 5 and 5 past better teams than us this season. Don't understand the hysteria - in fact I think it's absoultely bonkers - but maybe I'm slow on the uptake?

Got to stay positive.
Click to expand...

So, that's 300 million vs 3 million?

Are Chelsea a 100 times better? I'd expect them to be in double figures for 300 million.

5-0? *Shrugs.

We're in the Championship. They're in the Premiership which pulled up the financial ladder and 'fairness' long ago.

Boffin, I like your posts.

SA.
Click to expand...

Is that you Dad?

They are a lot better. It's a great advert for the quality of the Prem - some of these guys can't get first team football but they are top quality, It's fascinating to watch, in a morbidly curious kind of way.

And Fabregas and Hazard? Stunning players.

Good goal Forest, nice work Darikwa and (I think) Osborn.
 
Darikwa wooo, back in it decent goal. That's all summer signings off the mark, now to kick on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.