Quite shocked by the news. If neither party - MA and the Board - were 100% behind the future direction then it’s for the best. If it’s down to MA needing a rest, then that is totally understandable, and I respect the agreement that allows MA to do just that - and a diversion in to developing (perhaps part time) a group of U19 or U21 players elsewhere would seem ideal. For me, I’m sorry to see him go; his view on how the game should be played is a desirable one, but execution was lacking. How much is down to MA, the players, the coaching, is anybody’s guess. It has seemed, this season, a situation of a square peg in a round hole - trying to get a PL philosophy ingrained in to a group of L1/L2 players that simply are not up to it. A major upheaval in the squad is needed, and perhaps MA doesn’t (or the Board doesn’t) feel that he is fit enough to carry that through. There has seemed a sense of tension for a while. The lack of a Plan B in games, and cohesion in the squad, has been frustrating for a whille. While I am really sorry to see MA leave, and grateful for the glimpses of what might have been over the last couple of seasons, change was needed. A more dynamic and communication-savvy leader might be more appropriate at this level - to bring the best out of a solid L1 side? Thanks MA for keeping a steady ship afloat on choppy waters. It’s been a difficult few years, and we remain in L1. The expectation (not entitlement) is that we should be competing half a dozen places higher up the league table, and not require 44 games to survive with a reliance on there being four hopeless sides to cushion us. The first 70 minutes today (no passion, no direction, against a relegated side) proved that we will go down next season, if major change doesn’t eventuate. That obviously has started immediately. Thanks MA, and all the very best for the future.