You see Hampton, (and I know this will sound condescending, but there's no other way I can say it), this is why it's sometimes hard to have a decent, simple debate with you.
I know you said you tried to meet the SC in the SC, but I'm not sure of what your "wall of silence" looked like. Regardless, you then go on to compare this issue of "transparency" with my posts re the bloody government, bring in the thread title, Begbies and Prince bloody Andrew! Why? What on earth have they got to do with each other? I can't even begin to .........no, never mind, it's just not worth it.
I have no idea whether or not - despite your accusation - the SC or the CT want, or intend to "itemise their plans", but personally, no,. I don't care. I don't suspect the people of running either organisation of being dishonest - and accounts will need to be shown at some point - so I'm not even sure why I should be concerned.
You obviously are though, so I suggest you do something other than whinge on here about it.
For info, I wouldn't have made any response to your post (as I think everything's been said that previously that could be - you'll note I've not responded to Wlatic's post), but seeing as you felt it necessary to rope me into the debate, I thought I'd have my two penn'orth.