Clearly this is my fault, no matter how I've simplified this it goes completely over your head. All I can do is apologise for not speaking halfwit fluently.
Again you first made this personal, got one snarky comment back from me which provoked a laundry list of insults followed by a threat of stamping your little feet and taking your toys home. But by all means keep playing the martyr.
Also I didn't lose the argument (you'll notice those who desperately need to proclaim they've won very rarely actually have), you extolled the virtues of Robinson over that of Osborn on the grounds he was defensively more solid and you didn't care about full backs going forward. All of a sudden your position had changed, which suggests to me I won the argument as you've now fallen in line like a good chap.
Perhaps this is hope for you after all.
Quite the contrary, I can certainly commend your proficiency in speaking pompous, condescending, halfwit fluently 'Dude'.
Ask other posters sweetheart, run to mummy/teacher - whoever - you always try to move the goal posts (most likely to fan the flames of your overinflated ego) when the original statement was very simple - Byram (when fully fit) is a better footballer than Darikwa - simples. They have different attributes, but if fully fit Byram would get the starting position.
Sometimes, it takes courage to admit you're wrong - I'm happy to do so, when I'm wrong. I've explained countless times and even used your favoured stats to prove I'm right (notably, but not unexpectedly, ignored)!
For the record, my position has never changed on full backs (it was the position that paid me the most whilst playing - after 30, I had to change position), they have to be able to defend and provide an attacking impetus/threat. Overlapping runs and crossing are essential aspects that I coach into the full backs that I deal with - this is probably Darikwa's biggest weakness, if he works on that - he could be a real asset, because he has the defensive side as a real strength..
Osborn is good at the latter (attacking), but far too weak at the former (defending). Osborn's versatility is an asset, but that is also a weakness, as he does not specialise in a position - but, he is a player who adds to the team/squad - certainly, his link up ;play with Carvalho.
Byram is good enough at defending (certainly streets ahead of Osborn) but excels in distribution, passing, attacking & crossing when compared to TD.
This is my last entry (on this matter) - because, you fail to comprehend and will yet again, attempt to twist and manipulate in the futile hope of trying to justify a losing position (on a fit Byram v Darikwa) and then create an argument, I'd prefer to avoid getting into.
I'll leave you with a quote:
"Words are like weapons, they wound sometimes"
