Skoorb
Alert Team
It seemed to me (& some others based on the posts in the international break thread) that John Stones came in for more than his fair share of stick during the England v Scotland WC Qualifier on Friday.
The commentators, desperate in their desire to witness an upset seems IMO to give the Scots players a free pass on anything wayward that they did but constantly highlighted how poor the England players were. For example - at one point Anya made a complete dogs breakfast of an attempted cross but it was dismissed with a chuckle and zero criticism as if he was a plucky guy for having attempted such an audacious skill.
But John Stones's efforts to play the ball from the back seemed to be regarded especially by Glenn Hoddle, The Master of Hindsight, as an outrageously un-pc thing to do. All centre halves are required for it seems is to hoof the ball forward, leave the pretty stuff to the likes of Lallana, and kick or foul people if they seem likely to score. Even mistakes by some England players were ignored when it suited the narrative - Lallana at one point in the second half got caught in possession, showing a gross lack of awareness, but all this received was a pantomime like "behind you" and a chuckle from the commentator. :013:
Finally however Sam Wallace from the Telegraph has broken from the herd and spoken in defence ( :062: ) of Stones's style.
About time. What do you think in VMC? Do you hanker for a more agricultural defender or are you pleased City has a young defender who is prepared to take risks?
"Watching John Stones can be an unnerving experience, but he is a risk-taker and we must accept that"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/11/11/watching-john-stones-can-be-an-unnerving-experience-but-he-is-a/
The commentators, desperate in their desire to witness an upset seems IMO to give the Scots players a free pass on anything wayward that they did but constantly highlighted how poor the England players were. For example - at one point Anya made a complete dogs breakfast of an attempted cross but it was dismissed with a chuckle and zero criticism as if he was a plucky guy for having attempted such an audacious skill.
But John Stones's efforts to play the ball from the back seemed to be regarded especially by Glenn Hoddle, The Master of Hindsight, as an outrageously un-pc thing to do. All centre halves are required for it seems is to hoof the ball forward, leave the pretty stuff to the likes of Lallana, and kick or foul people if they seem likely to score. Even mistakes by some England players were ignored when it suited the narrative - Lallana at one point in the second half got caught in possession, showing a gross lack of awareness, but all this received was a pantomime like "behind you" and a chuckle from the commentator. :013:
Finally however Sam Wallace from the Telegraph has broken from the herd and spoken in defence ( :062: ) of Stones's style.
About time. What do you think in VMC? Do you hanker for a more agricultural defender or are you pleased City has a young defender who is prepared to take risks?
"Watching John Stones can be an unnerving experience, but he is a risk-taker and we must accept that"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/11/11/watching-john-stones-can-be-an-unnerving-experience-but-he-is-a/