Wonder if Gills Horse has heard anything similar...
Could their accountants have raised the issue, which may have caused the falling out?If there were irregularities in the last two financial years’ then the Gallinsons should be looking at their own accountants for not doing the due diligence properly.
Before any business is acquired the purchasers accountants will carry out a full and detailed due diligence.Could their accountants have raised the issue, which may have caused the falling out?
"demoted to Block A" ?Yes I had. I’d heard a near identical version of events just after the Bradford game, from someone within the club. Also heard the same on Monday via someone I know (who knows someone senior at the club).
Supposedly he’s been demoted to block A of the Medway Stand on match days and his office only. He’s not involved in any decisions now at all, and there are allegedly ‘irregularities’ in our last 2 financial years, that may be under investigation.
Could be complete bollocks, and I’d like to distance myself from directly accusing him of what’s been alleged.
But yes I’ve heard the same.
"demoted to Block A" ?
Not last Saturday.
Scally was sitting in the Directors block, with 2 young adults between him and the Galinsons.
He didn't look "ill" - but who knows ?
HMRC might well look into Scally's financial affairs.
Particularly after a significant event like the Takeover.
Someone on here speculated that Scally was entitled to £1,000,000 of Entrepreneur's Relief.
Tax breaks like E.R. have strict rules.
If they are supposed to be around "innovation", could that cover a football club ?
Either that, or the number of times E.R. can be used may be so few that HMRC look automatically at such events.
With Scally now being a minority shareholder, how much should we care about his tax affairs ?
Here here! For all his faults, it is unlikely any of us would be on here airing our thoughts on an almost daily basis had he not stepped in.Let's hope that Paul is not too poorly. Whatever complaints we've had, now is not the time to complain, as he saved us from a desperate situation.
If you are ill Paul, may you recover & enjoy a few more years of Gills!
Yes, of course - if Scally has committed some 'irregularities' it must be someone else's fault.If there were irregularities in the last two financial years’ then the Gallinsons should be looking at their own accountants for not doing the due diligence properly.
3 years! Poor Mr Perry will have chewed his nails down to his elbows by then. 5 years and he may have turned himself completely inside out!Will all come out in the wash in the future I guess - from what I’ve been told (dependant on who you hear it from) he’s here for the very least 3 years from the sale date, but a few others reckon 5.
It could well just be people who used to work for him, who have an axe to grind, spreading rubbish, but you also have to think there’s no smoke without some fire.
Will all come out in the wash in the future I guess - from what I’ve been told (dependant on who you hear it from) he’s here for the very least 3 years from the sale date, but a few others reckon 5.
"nothing to do with" sound a bit hostile (unnecessarily ? )Entrepreneur’s Relief is nothing to do with innovation.
If you are tax expert, please enlighten us to the extent of Entrepreneur's Relief.
(I know that "property" investment is excluded from a number of Tax Reliefs - e.g. investing in AIM companies).