HerrLjunga
Vital Football Hero
When they signed it was on two year deals the club has just announced. Why didn't they announce that at the time of signing? Good news anyway, certainly about Zak.
Err, they did i thinkWhen they signed it was on two year deals the club has just announced. Why didn't they announce that at the time of signing? Good news anyway, certainly about Zak.
Err, they did i think
Both news items appeared on the OS on 22 May. And both say it's 2 years.
I don't think they did, I remember seeing a discussion on here about it and the BBC story at the time stated the lengths had not been disclosed.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44215241
I believe the next African nations takes place in the summer in line with the next world cup .FIFA almost certainly pointing out if Africa can't do it how can you expect the rest of the world to play in the summer .But will we lose Zak to some African tournament next season or the one after?
It is extremely odd though. The articles are relatively "old" and not on the "latest news" option. So why bother to amend them? Conversely, why bother to announce the lengths if they were already in the articles?It's quite easy to amend an article after it's published, Durham. Why else would the club have made the announcement today if we already knew the contract lengths?