Sorry for being pleasant. Never viewed you as being so sensitive.
Just put me on ignore sweetheart.
This is pathetic.
:31:
kefkat - 11/2/2014 15:09
What you don't seem to get JF is that it is not the facts that caused the problem. You didn't cause any offence by the facts JF.
I just didn't like the words my dear and darling being used, that was what peeved me off. The undercurrent that came with them is what I was peeved about. Not the rest of it. Maybe as you said it was banter. Wording can often be misconstrued on the internet.
The figures vary so much from 1 article to another, f knows what the truth is. I know that people don't go to church as they used to once. You would have to be stupid to not know that.
How long have you been on vital? How long have you known me? How much pee taking do we do here? How much pee is taken out of me in great banter?
Kefkat my dear is hardly offensive, certainly no more than you suggesting I was 20% out in my figures.
The figures aren't that far out, you just tried to interpret the facts presented to make up the numbers hence I said I thought you were massaging them. I even checked with an expert and read about ten articles, all were 6-8%
Your last line goes against what you were saying, I said 5% you wrongly corrected me to 25%
I was gobsmacked you then implied I was attacking your or any one else's faith.
However,with all that said, as us atheists so often have to, I shall turn the other cheek, forgive you your trespasses and humbly apologise for trying to use a bit of levity and banter.
I always viewed you as one of the posters who were 'safe' for banter as you give out banter. My bad, my mistake, won't be made again and as a true atheist always will, I apologise for any offence caused.