I dont support a Premier League team, in fact i support a relatively obscure team from League 1. You know which. I don't like the Premier League or what it represents.
However, i think the introduction of VAR will be the deathnell for football. In cricket video replays have been an absolute farce. It started off with just a few decisions. Now the first thing that happens is they look to see whether it was a no ball or not, even though the no ball has not been called. This sort of thing will happen in football. Was it offside in the build up, was there a handball three minutes earlier, etc. It will completely spoil any enjoyment.
Also the crucial difference in rugby and cricket is the ball is out of play. What happens if the other team were breaking up field and score. Do they have a goal chalked off?
Dont get me wrong i have no problem with deciding on matters of fact (ball over the line is an example). It is deciding matters of opinion that is the oroblem. Only one person can adjudicate on those and that is the referee. Why have the ref at all? On who's sayso do you go to the video? It cant be on the players' because they always dispute decisions anyway.
Also, what is the obsession with getting every devision correct. How boring is that? What would people talk about?
The other thing is that it would start by just using it for a few decisions but will creep in using it for more and more.
The other thing is why have parachute payments? Another way to protect the elite. They have been relegated for not being good enough, why should they suddenly get an advantage? Yes their incomes have dropped but do what normal people do, if your income is higher for a few years and which may not last, you put a bit of money aside for a time when your income will fall.
However, i think the introduction of VAR will be the deathnell for football. In cricket video replays have been an absolute farce. It started off with just a few decisions. Now the first thing that happens is they look to see whether it was a no ball or not, even though the no ball has not been called. This sort of thing will happen in football. Was it offside in the build up, was there a handball three minutes earlier, etc. It will completely spoil any enjoyment.
Also the crucial difference in rugby and cricket is the ball is out of play. What happens if the other team were breaking up field and score. Do they have a goal chalked off?
Dont get me wrong i have no problem with deciding on matters of fact (ball over the line is an example). It is deciding matters of opinion that is the oroblem. Only one person can adjudicate on those and that is the referee. Why have the ref at all? On who's sayso do you go to the video? It cant be on the players' because they always dispute decisions anyway.
Also, what is the obsession with getting every devision correct. How boring is that? What would people talk about?
The other thing is that it would start by just using it for a few decisions but will creep in using it for more and more.
The other thing is why have parachute payments? Another way to protect the elite. They have been relegated for not being good enough, why should they suddenly get an advantage? Yes their incomes have dropped but do what normal people do, if your income is higher for a few years and which may not last, you put a bit of money aside for a time when your income will fall.