BlueWhite
Vital Squad Member
Kinygerbils - 19/3/2018 09:39
5th
Why 5th?
Kinygerbils - 19/3/2018 09:39
5th
USAFSPURS - 20/3/2018 19:48
5th would be an epic collapse
Topspur1 - 20/3/2018 23:54
Beating Chelski is out most important game IMO, even bigger than the FA cup game. We simply must have CL football next season.
I can't agree with that Scott, moving into our new stadium without CL football would be a major set back IMO. Losing £40 to £50m in revenue would hamper our ability to hang on to our best players, we all agree we need to up the salaries of our best players. Without CL football we would also struggle to attract the better players, for me choosing FA cup over CL is a short term success at the expenseof our long term goals.ScottDaYid - 21/3/2018 11:36
Topspur1 - 20/3/2018 23:54
Beating Chelski is out most important game IMO, even bigger than the FA cup game. We simply must have CL football next season.
Lol it's not even close. If someone said we would lose our last 8 league games and win our next 2 FA Cup games I'd take it in a heart beat.
It would be our best season in my lifetime, that's for sure.
Topspur1 - 21/3/2018 16:33
I can't agree with that Scott, moving into our new stadium without CL football would be a major set back IMO. Losing £40 to £50m in revenue would hamper our ability to hang on to our best players, we all agree we need to up the salaries of our best players. Without CL football we would also struggle to attract the better players, for me choosing FA cup over CL is a short term success at the expenseof our long term goals.ScottDaYid - 21/3/2018 11:36
Topspur1 - 20/3/2018 23:54
Beating Chelski is out most important game IMO, even bigger than the FA cup game. We simply must have CL football next season.
Lol it's not even close. If someone said we would lose our last 8 league games and win our next 2 FA Cup games I'd take it in a heart beat.
It would be our best season in my lifetime, that's for sure.
Nick Real Deal - 2/4/2018 15:00
Sorry missed the 1 off the 40 , 42 , 44 and 46. I am looking purely at prize money, not any facility stuff. Is the incentive of 2 mil per place enough ?
Nick Real Deal - 2/4/2018 16:30
Once 4th is pretty much guaranteed like it is for us now and the reward is the same as 3rd and 2nd ie CL . What is the point of busting your bollox to get an extra 4 mil for two places ?
Nick Real Deal - 2/4/2018 16:30
Once 4th is pretty much guaranteed like it is for us now and the reward is the same as 3rd and 2nd ie CL . What is the point of busting your bollox to get an extra 4 mil for two places ?
Spursex - 2/4/2018 17:40
Nick Real Deal - 2/4/2018 16:30
Once 4th is pretty much guaranteed like it is for us now and the reward is the same as 3rd and 2nd ie CL . What is the point of busting your bollox to get an extra 4 mil for two places ?
You are now a supporter of the 'Big 6' (ManC, Manure, Liverpool, Chelsea, Tottenham, Arsenal) proposal last year to change the payments formula so that they/we would get more of the money...
Of course the rest of the PL Chairman / Owners voted it down.
Our bonus structure means that for the players pool around 50% of anything above 7th goes straight into that pay-out to them; so overall the merit payments finishing pool can be uplifted by as much a further £10- 18mill (as facility payments are also placed into the pool) to be shared by the first team squad alone - and even then it's loaded again towards those who've made the greater number of starting appearances - so that extra place finish money incrementally divided by around 15-18 players means that the per head bonus for each player can be somewhere between £400k to £1.5 mill.
So anything above a 7th place finish can add a tasty sum - and that's 'just' the bonus pool for the Premier league payments, add in the Champions league progress payments and media fees and that pool can easily double.
Of course the domestic pool money is much smaller and almost not of consequence, but every penny helps....