Under Contract 2016/17
- Thread starter NottyImp
- Start date
G
Guest
Guest
Drawn 2 and lost 1.
G
Guest
Guest
Don't quite understand that one! Player said he would rather play elsewhere than Lincoln.
impede
Vital 1st Team Regular
You forgot your very own special official club jacket just like Moyses with your initials just where your beloved management have their initials so that it makes you look like you are really really important.johnolbe - 22/12/2015 17:37
Skip155 - 22/12/2015 17:15
Steve O'Dare - 22/12/2015 16:51
Complete nonsense. Are we really going to keep a player that obviously does not want to be here? Would we play him? Who would be paying his wages to sit on his behind? Strong management in my view.Skip155 - 22/12/2015 16:49
NottyImp - 22/12/2015 16:27
SIMJON - 22/12/2015 16:24
NottyImp - 22/12/2015 15:59
Depends how much you get.
Seriously though, we should be in a strong bargaining position if any offers do come in over the Summer, as we don't have to sell. Obviously, unless someone offers silly money, we shouldn't sell in January.
Unless of course they say they're unhappy, then we'll just give them away
I think - I hope - CM may have learned something from the Hearn debacle.
Me too. Weak management left us right up the pooper. Just got it wrong. Hindsight is a great thing though.
Right back at you. Making the 'problem' disappear to the detriment of the club is the opposite of strong management. Remember he's a Moyses man in a team full of men. Men don't throw toys out of pram and if they do they definitely don't get their own way. Bad parenting by Moyses :-)
Skip, you will never get a seat on the team bus, sat right behind the management, with an attitude like that. CM is always right and even if he might not be you are not allowed to say it. Now get into line!!!
G
Guest
Guest
Always the player in a situation such as this. Did you see his "effort" at Boreham Wood?
G
Guest
Guest
Players will always do as they want if they have interest to be at another club.
G
Guest
Guest
My lovely jacket. Yes I love it. It was a part of the deal from the game played on Sincil Bank to raise money for the youth set-up for which those that took part paid to play and manage. Both managers, I was one, got a jacket with their initials on whilst all the players were given full Lincoln City kits with their names on the shirts. Is there a problem with that? Should I ask you whether I can wear it or not?impede - 22/12/2015 17:55
You forgot your very own special official club jacket just like Moyses with your initials just where your beloved management have their initials so that it makes you look like you are really really important.johnolbe - 22/12/2015 17:37
Skip155 - 22/12/2015 17:15
Steve O'Dare - 22/12/2015 16:51
Complete nonsense. Are we really going to keep a player that obviously does not want to be here? Would we play him? Who would be paying his wages to sit on his behind? Strong management in my view.Skip155 - 22/12/2015 16:49
NottyImp - 22/12/2015 16:27
SIMJON - 22/12/2015 16:24
NottyImp - 22/12/2015 15:59
Depends how much you get.
Seriously though, we should be in a strong bargaining position if any offers do come in over the Summer, as we don't have to sell. Obviously, unless someone offers silly money, we shouldn't sell in January.
Unless of course they say they're unhappy, then we'll just give them away
I think - I hope - CM may have learned something from the Hearn debacle.
Me too. Weak management left us right up the pooper. Just got it wrong. Hindsight is a great thing though.
Right back at you. Making the 'problem' disappear to the detriment of the club is the opposite of strong management. Remember he's a Moyses man in a team full of men. Men don't throw toys out of pram and if they do they definitely don't get their own way. Bad parenting by Moyses :-)
Skip, you will never get a seat on the team bus, sat right behind the management, with an attitude like that. CM is always right and even if he might not be you are not allowed to say it. Now get into line!!!
G
Guest
Guest
Could have been better. Would there have been a difference if Hearn had played? Neither you nor I know that. If he had stayed would he have been selected as he didn't want to be here?
G
Guest
Guest
That is a fair comment but what would have happened if he had stayed? Was the manager not decisive in allowing him to go as he obviously didn't want to be at LCFC?
Cricklewoodimp
Vital 1st Team Regular
Hearn was indeed shocking against Boreham Wood. One can only imagine what his attitude would have been like if he didn't get his move.
We can only dream that Power has been tapped up...
If we'd have said no to the loan i don't believe Hearn would have downed tools for the season: He's in a position in his career where he simply can't afford to do that.
Personally i have my suspicions that CM didn't have any option, ie it was contractual. To have a policy where any player can declare themselves 'unhappy' and be free to leave is madness, and asking for future trouble.
Personally i have my suspicions that CM didn't have any option, ie it was contractual. To have a policy where any player can declare themselves 'unhappy' and be free to leave is madness, and asking for future trouble.
What do you mean by contractual? Like an appearance clause where he had to give a decision on whether to extend (he left us on 19 appearances I think?)?
I’d be hugely surprised if, given the gamble he was, we’ve allowed him so much power in that respect. It should be a Club decision.
I’d be hugely surprised if, given the gamble he was, we’ve allowed him so much power in that respect. It should be a Club decision.
ImpfromWashy
Vital Squad Member
Totally agree with SOD......I have no idea as to the reason that Hearn wanted to leave but as soon as CM was informed then there was no point in forcing him to stay. If a player has no desire and his heart isn't in it then there is no way he will give a 100%.
I don't think Hearn will play for the Imps again....time to move on and find a suitable replacement in January.
I don't think Hearn will play for the Imps again....time to move on and find a suitable replacement in January.
Maybe something like that, maybe something different, I'm only speculating really.
As you say, his signing was a gamble and I think CM said the club was 'protected' against his injuries. I think it was a contract more complicated than the norm and could well have had some get out for the player as a compromise for the get out for the club.
It's all speculation on my part though.
G
Guest
Guest
Okay. To put it another way. He had a much stronger desire to be playing at Barrow than at Lincoln. If not he would not have gone would he?
