Tottenham Stadium News That Will Shock Spurs Fans

VitalFootballAdmin

Vital Squad Member
Staff member
At the beginning of this season I was given a story that seemed so implausible, at the time that had it not been from such an impeccable source I would have dismissed it as nonsense.


<br><br><a href ="http://www.vitalfootball.co.uk/router.asp?7522250">Click here to read the article</a><br><br>
 
Gary Taylor sent us the following.

At the beginning of this season I was given a story that seemed so implausible, at the time that had it not been from such an impeccable source I would have dismissed it as nonsense.

I was told, that by the beginning of the season, the project was already three months ahead of schedule and that the builders were on massive bonuses to finish the project so that the club could play there the following season.

At the time I kept thinking that it would be impossible to demolish the old stadium and build the remaining third in three months, but every time I have returned to the stadium and seen how advanced the work is, it has played on my mind. Why was it so important that the builders cut the corner out of the North Stand when they would still have 14 months to build the final third of the stadium? Why have the club not signed the contract for next season with Wembley? And why, have the marketing team not begun selling Wembley hospitality packages for next season “to existing executive members, when they have already sold them their seats in the new stadium?” Last season contracts went out in November.

Over the Christmas period, I read up on the construction plans and was intrigued to read that the single tier 17,000 all-seated South Stand will not be a concrete construction as is the rest of the stadium, but a steel construction with a concrete finish. This suggests that it would not only be erected quicker than the rest of the stadium, but could be built independently after the rest of the stadium was built.

Just last week I was talking to a member of Spurs staff and was surprised to hear that they had not been given any information on their roles for next season at Wembley, however, the insider told me that whenever the 2017/18 season is mentioned, the hierarchy always use the term, “If we go to Wembley”, not “When we go”.

As I understand it, should this mild winter continue and the building work continues at its current pace, Tottenham will apply to the Premier League for their opening group of fixtures to be played away from home, very much in the same way that Liverpool have this season whilst their new main stand was being constructed and West Ham will next season with the World Athletics taking place at the London Stadium. This will give them enough time to bulldoze the Paxton Road North Stand after the final game of this season and lay the pitch in the new stadium. Tottenham will then play in a horseshoe like stadium whilst the 17,000 all-seater terrace is constructed and other finishes applied to the rest of the stadium. Considering safety aspects the capacity should be around 40,000, some 8,000 more than the current capacity and saving the club around £15 million in costs of playing at Wembley.
 
The guy who has been the go to on everything Stadium related has only just stopped laughing at this.

He said the guy who came up with this has no notion of the time it would take to finish first fix after the basic structure is up and how long it would take to complete second fix on a project this size.
 
I think this is believable, It was even said on television that there is a small chance we may play at Tottenham next season in one form or another. If the club spends half of what it would cost to play at Wembley on builders bonuses then I am sure the building company will find a way to pull it off. I went on the live feed yesterday (Sunday) and there were loads of workers on site. I would also point out that it was the original plan to play in a horse shoe shaped stadium for a period of time.
 
Live Webcam: Watch White Hart Lane Being Constructed

http://www.spurs.vitalfootball.co.uk/article.asp?a=7522264

 
zzz - 13/1/2017 12:06

The guy who has been the go to on everything Stadium related has only just stopped laughing at this.

He said the guy who came up with this has no notion of the time it would take to finish first fix after the basic structure is up and how long it would take to complete second fix on a project this size.

Z,

I have to agree with you, especially as my experience of big projects tells me exactly this. Don't think his interpretation is plausible at all.
 
http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/tottenham-must-activate-option-to-play-at-wembley-by-the-end-of-march-to-secure-temporary-home-for-a3442511.html

or this will work:

http://tinyurl.com/gv3lkuu



 
Interesting we have til March. Assumed it would be signed, sealed and delivered that we're at Wembley next season... Do you think that gives some credence to the story above Ex?
 
freundorfoe - 18/1/2017 01:53

Interesting we have til March. Assumed it would be signed, sealed and delivered that we're at Wembley next season... Do you think that gives some credence to the story above Ex?

It's second guessing really, but it would be a first on a project of this magnitude to see accelerations and amendments to the project plan like this - I can't recall anything even remotely similar, so I'd say it doesn't add any credibility to the story - but then there is always a first time for everything!

I'd say we're signing with Wembley, unless we still have a plan 'b' in mind that *might* offer us a different/cheaper option?
 
Well, these guys think that any chance of us moving in early is a non-starter..

I think this nails it..

http://www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/news/confirmed-spurs-not-moving-new-12482367