And how did the original forces get there? A question atheists and scientists demand from the religious.
Scientists have no idea only a guess based on their latest knowledge. The yogic Sanskrit writings over 5000 yrs ago told of what we now call quantum physics so basically nobody knows f all but want to tell us their 'facts' from both sides both of which may or may not be true.
For more context, see the next post.
So was the Question (Jerry: Correct me if I'm wrong).
What happened before the Big Bang ?
Was there "nothing", "emptiness" , whatever ?
There are no "facts" to answer this Question only best guesses.
Aside from whether I understood the Question properly, it occcurred to me that "their "facts" from both sides" isn't how most scientists approach such topics.
Scientists have "conjectures", "hypotheses" and "theories".
Each stage has a different amount of evidence.
And even with a "theory" supported by current evidence, there remains the possibility of new evidence.
But the lack of evidence for pre-Big Bang is not in itself evidence for the existence of god.
Why revive this ?
Three reasons:
1) The start of the universe is in itself "interesting".
2) Current knowledge and thought processes around the Big Bang is such that it is a good counter to the notion of "the science" as some immutable "fact".
More importantly, that most scientists are careful about what they say is a "fact".
3) To acquire knowledge or enlightenment requires dialogue - where the subject matter is challenged, not the "virtue" of the participants.
So if we can get through this topic, we can get through anything .