The Ugly Truth of English Football Coaching

Soccerates

Vital Squad Member
After the England side managed to crawl its way into the World Cup semi-finals and then fall to defeat of our own making, I sat back and reflected upon where we are when it comes to huge disconnect we have when it comes to producing elite coaches in the game.

We have very good coaches up and down the country, but when it comes to producing elite managers, and elite coaches, we are way behind pretty much every other major nation on the planet.

We are producing good players at all levels - heck, even look at us - propped up by our own production line.

What we don't have, I feel (from being an insider) are properly qualified, nuanced coaches who make it into management and then do well.

We've had an alarmingly low number of top division English managers for decades and their backroom teams are also filled with people from around the globe. I don't blame them for coming and getting the money but there's a huge disconnect when it comes to producing top level coaches in this country.

In my view, we simply do not take it seriously enough - we have many more courses that coaches have to jump through and the costs are an order of magnitude higher than in any other country. These courses run into to tens of thousands to go from a standing start to a full UEFA Pro Licence and this pay to coach model the FA have provided has been going on for the best part of two decades. The amount of coaches I know at the same level as myself who went abroad to gain their UEFA B Licence should be a national scandal.

The costs here have also skyrocketed, with the FA demanding that Academy coaches do the youth awards across three levels to attain the same standards that a foreign coach can do in half the time and for a quarter of the cost. It means that there's a much wider pool of highly-qualified and experienced coaches in other nations than we have here. Subsequently, we have a shockingly low number of A Licence and Pro Licence qualified coaches and managers when compared to Spain, who have over double the amount at each of the top tw coaching levels and nearly three times as many as we do at UEFA B level, which is the mandatory course you need to have to coach at academy level.

The Elite Player Performance Plan has in effect shielded coaches from risk, focusing heavily on player development, which has been a good thing for players, but means that there's little incentives for coaches to further themselves, both by the cost and a lack of real stakes for the coaches to push beyond being a good academy coach. We would not produce a Luis De La Fuente here.

The FA really need to get their act together when it comes to providing coaches from this country a better and more cohesive and import Aly cost effective route to becoming the best that they can be, not just producing good academy level coaches who are merely happy to be there. In a way, coaches are priced out here in exactly the same way fans are and the wages (which is why I won't do it) are nothing near a viable return on investment. The current system is exploitative, to say the least.

If the FA does want to get serious about coach education, then I suggest it does three things:

1. A redesign of the coaching pathway which matches the EPPP program.
2. Reduces the cost barrier to entry for coaches.
3. Works with the independent football regulator to ensure English/British coaches are supported properly when it comes to bringing forth highly qualified, experienced coaches.

We need to have a proper conversation about this, because when the chips are down, we choke.
 
How many world class players do we.have.
Who consistently perform well on the international stage. Bellingham. Might perform. 3 games out of 7. Same with the captain.
When you’re going. To a World Cup. With the likes of Dan Burn and John Stones. Let’s be realistic. We didn’t stand a chance of winning it.
It was a miracle we got this far.
 
How many world class players do we.have.

Who consistently perform well on the international stage. Bellingham. Might perform. 3 games out of 7. Same with the captain.

When you’re going. To a World Cup. With the likes of Dan Burn and John Stones. Let’s be realistic. We didn’t stand a chance of winning it.

It was a miracle we got this far.
You say Bellingham and Kane only perform 3 out of 7 games for England. Have you asked yourself why they perform 50 out of 50 for Real Madrid and Bayern Munich?

It is because those clubs operate with highly defined, sophisticated tactical systems that provide consistent structural support and isolate their strengths. When you shove world-class players into a reactive, disconnected system where the midfield is bypassed and the attackers are starved of service, of course they look inconsistent. They are being asked to produce individual miracles out of nothing because the collective function simply isn't there.

Saying we can't win a World Cup with players like John Stones or Dan Burn completely misunderstands how international tournaments are actually won.

Under Pep Guardiola, Stones looks like a generation-defining, ball-playing defender who dissects Europe's best teams. Why? Because the system protects him and utilises his technical proficiency. He only looks exposed for England because dropping into a rigid, desperate low block turns any defender into a sitting duck in a shooting gallery. Look at who actually wins these tournaments—Spain won Euro 2024 with Robin Le Normand and Marc Cucurella. Argentina won the 2022 World Cup with a 34-year-old Nicolás Otamendi.

Elite systems make functional players look world-class. Broken systems make world-class players look ordinary.

It wasn't a miracle we reached the semi-final; it was individual talent repeatedly bailing out managerial cowardice. We scraped past Norway solely because of individual magic saving a broken setup. With the sheer economic power, academy infrastructure, and baseline talent pool we possess in this country, reaching a semi-final should be the bare minimum expectation, not a miracle.

We didn't lose because our players aren't good enough. We lost because when we went 1-0 up, the touchline panicked. We withdrew Gordon—our only out-ball—threw on Konsa, shifted to a back five, and actively invited players like Messi, Mac Allister, and Enzo Fernández to attack us for 25 uninterrupted minutes. We didn't swap Gordon for another outlet, we didn't follow the blueprint of how we scored and we didn't see that their back four had ran their race and had little else left to give. What's even more galling is Anthony Barry during his half time interview explicitly said we needed to play possession football in their half. The only top class coach says the thing we need to do, manager overrules that, and we lost because of it.

We have the technical players. What we don't have—and haven't had for decades—is a coach in the technical area who actually trusts them. Argentina are hardly filled with world class players but squeeze every last bit of football out of them.

Again, it speaks to how we coach, how many coaches we produce at the highest level and how much emphasis we place on making it at the very least a viable option for those in the game to progress and realise their true potential. We don't have it, other countries do.