I agree with this ... but Paul Cook had far more experience. Who's to say that as Maloney gains that experience, he won't in future be in a position where he'd have got 20 points more from these players?Paul Cook would have this squad at least 10 points better off, I'm certain of it.
Shaun Maloney and Paul Cook are chalk and cheese in terms of managerial styles and always will be no matter how much longer Maloney spends in management. And you know it!I agree with this ... but Paul Cook had far more experience. Who's to say that as Maloney gains that experience, he won't in future be in a position where he'd have got 20 points more from these players?
Again, I agree ... though I'm not sure that "styles" has anything to do with it. I agreed with your first post due to the difference in experience. That doesn't mean that Maloney couldn't perform better in years to come with similar experience to Cook.Shaun Maloney and Paul Cook are chalk and cheese in terms of managerial styles and always will be no matter how much longer Maloney spends in management. And you know it!
No, just one or the other, no sitting on the fence Tony. I see you haven't voted yet, come on It won't spoil your cred.Need an option for "both" Zakky.
Sorry mate, but I'm not voting for one or the other ... that's just daft.No, just one or the other, no sitting on the fence Tony. I see you haven't voted yet, come on It won't spoil your cred.
League position?Sorry mate, but I'm not voting for one or the other ... that's just daft.
The manager has undoubtedly made mistakes, but it's not cos of his tactics that players make cock-ups. The players absolutely shoulder a significant proportion of the blame for not performing against the poorer teams.
I suppose the buck stops with the manager, but looking at the league position, it's senseless actually talking about a buck in the first place !
With respect to Shaun Maloney, and I’d love to see him have an excellent managerial career, Paul Cook is currently on four league titles and that’s not including any of his feats in Ireland. If Shaun Maloney betters that, I’ll eat my hat if I was wearing one.Again, I agree ... though I'm not sure that "styles" has anything to do with it. I agreed with your first post due to the difference in experience. That doesn't mean that Maloney couldn't perform better in years to come with similar experience to Cook.
If me Auntie etc ...League position?
If we don't stop the rot we could finish as low as 19th.
Sorry mate, but I'm not voting for one or the other ... that's just daft.
The manager has undoubtedly made mistakes, but it's not cos of his tactics that players make cock-ups. The players absolutely shoulder a significant proportion of the blame for not performing against the poorer teams.
I suppose the buck stops with the manager, but looking at the league position, it's senseless actually talking about a buck in the first place !
For the 3rd time, I'm not comparing the two.With respect to Shaun Maloney, and I’d love to see him have an excellent managerial career, Paul Cook is currently on four league titles and that’s not including any of his feats in Ireland. If Shaun Maloney betters that, I’ll eat my hat if I was wearing one.
Why don't you blame the players in that strong team? ... the ones who stroll about cos they can't be arsed to motivate themselves?Watching today finally convinced me that Shaun is not the man to take us forward. That was a pretty strong team we had out against arguably the poorest opponents I've seen all season and we were well beaten. We stroll about the pitch at snails pace, fail to get any momentum into our play, and look totally unmotivated. If it was an occasional trait ok but it's not and the manager isn't able or capable it seems of rectifying it, Nobody has wanted him to succeed more than me but if I was Mr Danson I would sack him tonight.
You said earlier that is was a strong team even with the 8 changes.If me Auntie etc ...
Even 19th would have been a happy finish at the start of the season.
That said, why sack a manager who might finish in 10th?
I do blame the players who dont give 100% but the managers job is to get the best out of his players and he has failed to do thatWhy don't you blame the players in that strong team? ... the ones who stroll about cos they can't be arsed to motivate themselves?