The Philosophy Thread

BodyButter - 29/11/2017 12:41

Interesting stuff, Lewis. If you don't mind me asking, what do you do?

Even defining happiness is difficult. Contentment is certainly a more achievable goal. Unfortunately, I don't seem to do contentment very well. I reached a massive milestone in my business this year but it just sets me up to try to achieve more next year. I don't think it's healthy or particularly positive but that's me.

I work in content design. Mainly on GOV.UK.





 
Yeah, decent video that. The pursuit of fulfilment probably would be more sensible than the pursuit of happiness.

I guess a good example for me would be the marathon. I can't say training for it made me happy, I can't say doing it was a happy experience, I did however enjoy the challenge, chasing what I thought would be fulfilling a bucket list item. I was happy when I finished but back to the original question, happiness is only a fleeting emotion. The fulfilment and sense of achievement however, remains.
 
I always feel better when I've solved a problem. The bigger the problem, and the challenge it presents, to more content I feel when I solve it. Of course, you then need the problem in the first place to ultimately get to the good stuff, which might be seem a bit masochistic.
 
I think you feel and enjoy the highs so much more if you've experienced the lows.

Probably not the same for everyone, I think some peoples lives are Olson a more even keel than what mine has been like, but for sure when I achieve some of the things I've done, it's the real health lows that inform the joys of the achievement
 
I can empathise there, J. Things haven't worked out as I had planned but I'm probably happier now. Probably the same as you, being pushed down a certain path because of health issues and that path actually being a good thing.

Day to day, I find that looking after the Dogs helps, as well. They don't judge you. :109: :109:
 
JuanPabloAngel - 2/12/2017 12:46

HeathfieldRoad1874 - 2/12/2017 12:44

Day to day, I find that looking after the Dogs helps, as well. They don't judge you. :109: :109:

Just don't let them watch YouTube :3:

They don't watch YouTube, they're on YouTube.


"Fenton!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
 
There seems to be a growing consensus among string theory advocates and tech bros that we are living in a simulation.

Is anyone else in that frame of mind?

It kinda opens the door to a whole load of weird questions.
 
There seems to be a growing consensus among string theory advocates and tech bros that we are living in a simulation.

Is anyone else in that frame of mind?

It kinda opens the door to a whole load of weird questions.

Yeah, I've come across similar theories before.

There's the obvious question like who or what created and controls the simulation? Is it alien or a far future version of ourselves?

Then what would happen if this was ever confirmed or proven to be true? Do we have any control over it? Are we restricted by the laws of physics or is that just part of the sim? Can I just start flying if I really believe? What are the rules?

Do we have to wait for a call from Laurence Fishburne to really figure it out?!
 
Yeah, I've come across similar theories before.

There's the obvious question like who or what created and controls the simulation? Is it alien or a far future version of ourselves?

Then what would happen if this was ever confirmed or proven to be true? Do we have any control over it? Are we restricted by the laws of physics or is that just part of the sim? Can I just start flying if I really believe? What are the rules?

Do we have to wait for a call from Laurence Fishburne to really figure it out?!

Hahaha.
 
There seems to be a growing consensus among string theory advocates and tech bros that we are living in a simulation.

Is anyone else in that frame of mind?

It kinda opens the door to a whole load of weird questions.
Jean Baudrillard Simulacra and Simulation, covers this in a typically french, obtuse and almost unreadable way.