The best way to manage / handle extreme views?

  • Thread starter Villan Of The North
  • Start date
kefkat - 20/5/2015 11:21

col8 - 20/5/2015 11:16

Make them support Birmingham City, condem them to life with nothing but drudgery, make they sit next to smelly unwashed fuckers week in week out....

Thats extreme punishment.

If they are good they can get parole to spend the rest fo their time with Carson Yeung in a Hong Kong jail :17:

At least whilst he is in the clink he dont have to watch that shower of shit....
 
Its interesting the way different people perceive things. We invade Iraq when everyone thought it would be Afghanistan to find Binbag after 9-11 A lot of people disagreed with this war legal or not. Then after making a balls up of Iraq we ( I speak of GB. & the USA) do not go back in when 30,000 + militants start beheading and killing all and sundry ? Yes Sadam was a tyrant who killed hundreds of thousands of his own and the Kurdish people but was no worse than ISIS. Strange thing is I think public opinion would not be against troops on the ground to deal with this scum providing we act with U.N. approval. I understand we could only deal with those in IRAQ by invitation and are unlikely to get an invitation from Syria but surely we have a moral obligation to Iraq to help them out considering we helped create this mess in the first place. As for those who want to go and fight for ISIS my feeling is let them but they automatically lose the right to come back to G.B. Sticking them in prison for a couple of years seems to me a way of storing up trouble for the future in creating home grown terrorists who upon release will hate this country even more.
 
VOTN - so how do you accept the fight against Nazism, yet not Islamism?

And being against Nazism is that not also "extreme" views?

Yes I am against Islamism - that must make me extreme because I believe in freedom. The Islamization of the world(Just like Nazism) threatens those very freedoms.

Also no need to open 2 threads on the same topic! We could have discussed this in the French mayor's thread - as you see his views as "extreme"!
 
It's a separate discussion, not about Islam specifically but about extreme views and the best way to handle them.

And no, I'm not comparing Islam to Nazism, that's you and I think only you (maybe POL), I'm more comparing your intolerance to Nazism.

My question was what we should do, two different approaches, which gives the best results, or is there a third way? Should we try to marginalise and risk the extremists gaining popularity through exploiting the fears of the public, as happened in 1930s Germany or should we have an open discussion, inevitably giving the extremists a greater platform, which can also lead to the popularisation of the minority extremist.

You clearly don't believe in freedom as you don't believe people should be allowed to peacefully live their lives according to their choice of religion. I know you state that Islam is evil but it's simply not a fact it's just your biased opinion, to which you are entitled but that doesn't make you the arbiter of truth and that is why so many disagree with you.

 
Merlin128777 - 20/5/2015 14:20

Its interesting the way different people perceive things. We invade Iraq when everyone thought it would be Afghanistan to find Binbag after 9-11 A lot of people disagreed with this war legal or not. Then after making a balls up of Iraq we ( I speak of GB. & the USA) do not go back in when 30,000 + militants start beheading and killing all and sundry ? Yes Sadam was a tyrant who killed hundreds of thousands of his own and the Kurdish people but was no worse than ISIS. Strange thing is I think public opinion would not be against troops on the ground to deal with this scum providing we act with U.N. approval. I understand we could only deal with those in IRAQ by invitation and are unlikely to get an invitation from Syria but surely we have a moral obligation to Iraq to help them out considering we helped create this mess in the first place. As for those who want to go and fight for ISIS my feeling is let them but they automatically lose the right to come back to G.B. Sticking them in prison for a couple of years seems to me a way of storing up trouble for the future in creating home grown terrorists who upon release will hate this country even more.

:1: :1: Great post mate well said and i agree totally :7:
 
LOL you mean wafer thin Trekker dude wafer thin ham lol,,,,you think of everybody oh what about gay cake?
 
LOL lost me on constitutes Trekker dude sirry ;0] i imagine gay cake tastes more fluffy for some reason and is made by somebody whistling happy songs as they baked it,,,,,i am losing the plot ay i!!!
 
Bear Grylls has two uninhabited Islands in the Pacific going begging ideal for total anarchy.
 
LOL Great idea, get all with extreemist views on Bear Grylis islands and let em fight it out in a big brother style programme, but the quickest way to win would be to hunt Bear Grylis automatic win for hunting the ba**ad, i l would watch this show, i could just imagine GT rallying his troops to go into battle like a brave heart moment,,,,,they may take our lives but they will never take our ''RELIIIIIIIGIOOOOON''