Social Media Boycott | Page 3 | Vital Football

Social Media Boycott

Even read the Martin Lewis article wondering if there was any context, sort of knowing there couldn’t be, I mean, it’s Martin Lewis, Mr Nice Guy and it’s all about money saving and consumer rights
 
Gillette said:
Is it the question mark. He's not saying he wants it.....he's questioning if it should happen. Maybe hang means you know chill, chat together.

But seriously,
My wife has worked in moderation (not for FB or Twitter) and she would be referring it.
Click to expand...

No because the opening word is the offensive end, the latter being a question that I would say was an attempt to be clever to circumvent the rules. I'd remove on the first word full stop - even in my above rap ticket concert re hang - wait around etc - it's superseded by the first word even in that context really.
 
The Fear said:
Even read the Martin Lewis article wondering if there was any context, sort of knowing there couldn’t be, I mean, it’s Martin Lewis, Mr Nice Guy and it’s all about money saving and consumer rights
Click to expand...

Seems the comment is gone? Although that could have been deleted by Martin Lewis or whoever runs his page I guess.

That's very strange, I got suspended for posting a picture of Trump and Kim Jong Un stroking each other's rockets.
 
Maybe another complaint saw a competent moderator look at it?

In fairness to you, I'd need to know whether 'rockets' was a euphemism - assuming not, I can see it removed for libel, offence, porn reasons - but not a ban unless it was the fifth time you'd posted it lol
 
mike_field said:
Maybe another complaint saw a competent moderator look at it?

In fairness to you, I'd need to know whether 'rockets' was a euphemism - assuming not, I can see it removed for libel, offence, porn reasons - but not a ban unless it was the fifth time you'd posted it lol
Click to expand...

lol, no there were literally rockets where their, uh "rockets" should be.

I did actually appeal it and got the ban rescinded a couple of days later.
 
In that case shouldn't have been banned, and arguably not removed unless there was a genuine libel complaint because of connotations or an offence complaint where it was deemed you were mocking non heterosexuals - but I'd reject the latter because the statement would be 'wannabe big men stroking their own'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.