UnbelievableJeff
Vital Squad Member
Oh come on.
The critics need to take a long hard look at our tactics.
The drop to the floor of the GK, whomever it is, for a tactical time out. This isn't basketball you know. We often take an inordinate amount of time on our throws etc.
Gareth came to do a job. He did a job. If we had put one of our many chances away, we would have seen a more urgent Wycombe side. We didn't. So they didn't change. It is up to the match officials to sort this out and if they had possessed a back home and sorted it out, then it would have ended. It is just a part of the game. It happens in cricket all the time, with the slowing of over rates and silly tricks to disrupt the batsmen from scoring and to put them off their stride.
Besides in his post match interview DC said "I've done it. So I am not going to criticise him (Ainsworth)"
Ainsworth is not under our employ. He is paid by Wycombe to do a job for them. It may not be attractive. It may bend the rules to breaking point, but there are four people of whom are meant to enforce those rules, and if they don't then that is not Ainsworth's fault.
Yes it was straight out of the John Beck coaching manual. By and large he had a good record as a league manager and he got results. FA Cup QFs twice with Cambridge and nearly took them all the way to what is now the Premier League.
He also took us from a pushover to facilitate our promotion to the old Division Three.
Ainsworth came here to do a job. He did the job with excellence and deserves credit for it. When you look at that coldly, and without red and white blinkers on, you can appreciate that.
If we are not good enough to beat that system, and we weren't, then it just looks and sounds like real sour grapes.
If the situation occurred, I'd have him back here in a heartbeat.
The critics need to take a long hard look at our tactics.
The drop to the floor of the GK, whomever it is, for a tactical time out. This isn't basketball you know. We often take an inordinate amount of time on our throws etc.
Gareth came to do a job. He did a job. If we had put one of our many chances away, we would have seen a more urgent Wycombe side. We didn't. So they didn't change. It is up to the match officials to sort this out and if they had possessed a back home and sorted it out, then it would have ended. It is just a part of the game. It happens in cricket all the time, with the slowing of over rates and silly tricks to disrupt the batsmen from scoring and to put them off their stride.
Besides in his post match interview DC said "I've done it. So I am not going to criticise him (Ainsworth)"
Ainsworth is not under our employ. He is paid by Wycombe to do a job for them. It may not be attractive. It may bend the rules to breaking point, but there are four people of whom are meant to enforce those rules, and if they don't then that is not Ainsworth's fault.
Yes it was straight out of the John Beck coaching manual. By and large he had a good record as a league manager and he got results. FA Cup QFs twice with Cambridge and nearly took them all the way to what is now the Premier League.
He also took us from a pushover to facilitate our promotion to the old Division Three.
Ainsworth came here to do a job. He did the job with excellence and deserves credit for it. When you look at that coldly, and without red and white blinkers on, you can appreciate that.
If we are not good enough to beat that system, and we weren't, then it just looks and sounds like real sour grapes.
If the situation occurred, I'd have him back here in a heartbeat.