The whole argument is riddled with hypocrisies.
When things are going well, it's great that the club is using the fans money wisely, and we enjoy seeing some good football.
When things aren't going well, the club should have invested in players... Well where does that money come from? You can't have it both ways.
When things are going very badly it's the 'fault' of those who attend the match.
If you're ever proud of the support and following that the club has, then you're a hypocrite if you think that support should now stop.
To my mind, if you pay for Sky, you're as guilty (if not moreso), of contributing towards the way the game has gone. If there wasn't so much money in the game due to people sitting on their fat arses paying Rupert Murdoch through the nose, then perhaps we might have some slightly more football orientated people in charge of clubs.
In fighting and point scoring is just a pointless waste of energy.