I know where you are coming from, but how do you know she is unqualified, just as you do not know why OP's wife took such a dreadful decision.So conjecture. Having an unqualified person undertake a variety of roles raises questions as to competence such as refusal to interview witnesses. Lack of appeal procedure is also odd. Clearly the system isn’t as good as it should be and it has raised doubts as to the validity of the outcome, though the evidence itself seems pretty definitive in this case. It seems you are still conflating the two issues.
He is reportedly not very bright but very well connected.
Have you seen the board members of the Museum of Communist Terror?
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10970407/officers
I know where you are coming from, but how do you know she is unqualified, just as you do not know why OP's wife took such a dreadful decision.
You are just as guilty of conjecture
I was not conflating 2 issues, I responded to your conjecture and what I believed was your misunderstanding (based on what I had seen reported)
I agree with everything you say from "clearly"
I have to say, any sympathy (and it's not much) that one might have with Paterson immediately goes away listening to his self pitying resignation statement.
He's actually accused folk including MPs !!! of "publicly mock and deride Rose's death and belittling our pain".
I've neither heard nor read anything of the sort.
FineShes a former social worker. She’s hasn’t a degree in law nor has experience in investigating, prosecuting, or adjudicating on complex or sensitive offences. She is therefore unqualified and doesn’t possess the requisite gravitas to hold an important post. Hope this helps
The interview he did with sky last night is also a peachThe article he wrote in the Telegraph was just as bad and hit the wrong tone.
It is on the companies house site, it is a real company, with real wing nut directors.I might be being a little thick here ......... but what's that supposed to be? (I know it's a company, but is it a real one .......and if so, doing what?)
The interview he did with sky last night is also a peach
and those 17 witnesses that you said were important but not interviewed, were character witnessesI’ve not seen that one. Perhaps a little contrition on his part may have helped his cause.
Shes a former social worker. She’s hasn’t a degree in law nor has experience in investigating, prosecuting, or adjudicating on complex or sensitive offences. She is therefore unqualified and doesn’t possess the requisite gravitas to hold an important post. Hope this helps