I know it's market forces etc but no player in the country at any level should be on 12.5 grand a week.
That's the root of all football's problems.
Jeff, the general principle I understand but Premiership players not earning that kind of money when their league‘s income runs into tens of billions isn’t realistic.
That players are overpaid generally speaking is what most of us working folk agree with, but the players represent a
very tiny percentage of the population able to play the sport to the extent that people will pay to watch them.
”Twenty grand a week for kicking a bag of wind about” is the type of inane shyte that really irritates me ....I can kick a bag of wind about (or I could at one time
) but no one absolutely no one was ever interested in watching me do so or would pay to watch me.
Now I think Lewis Hamilton getting £2m a race (is it?) ...for driving a bloody car round in a circle is pretty obscene .....or top golfers being multi millionaires (many of them without necessarily winning anything of note) while they “twat a little ball round a park with a stick”
Is Tom Cruise or Hanks getting £10/15m for “playing pretends“ in a film right ?
You can reduce anything in sport or the arts to that kind of language.
Jeff states that wages are the fundamental fault in the whole economic model in professional football...and I’m sure he is right ....I agree, it’s just that it’s always footballers who seem to be cited as the overpaid ‘greedy’ pariahs of society.
(oh and that Dan Brown is a multi millionaire on the back of his ‘novels’ but I wouldn’t let him write a note to my milkman ....mind you I’d happily read a cheque if the bugger made one out to WASC‘s Crowdfunder
)