Redevelopment/Refurbishment underway

Wasn’t the original purpose of the last temp stand, to provide a mandatory number of covered seats for away fans.

I’m only guessing but perhaps we now cover that by giving a limited number of rail seating in the SW, allowing the Temp stand to be bigger, without a roof blocking the view for some from the St Andrews. I could be wrong.

Time will tell but as it helps more home fans in the ground then brilliant..
 
Just has a look at the planning portal and this looks like a revision added to the original temp stand plan, which is still on the same application. Looking at the revisions, it shows 583 seats and definitely no roof. If there was it would seriously impede the view from the main stand.
 
clanford said:
Just has a look at the planning portal and this looks like a revision added to the original temp stand plan, which is still on the same application. Looking at the revisions, it shows 583 seats and definitely no roof. If there was it would seriously impede the view from the main stand.
Click to expand...
Think you’re right, just spotted that there are blue sight lines from the St Andrews to the NE corner flag. A roof would certainly get in the way if it covered the whole temp.
 
Maybe stretch to some lorry tarps for them. All joking aside I would hate us to be involved in a Village Green Rovers type debacle as we literally wouldn't even have the option of putting them elsewhere.
 
Impish said:
Didn’t I read a few months ago that the away dressing room has been designed to offer no home comfort? Sounds like the away fans are going to be treated the same!?
Click to expand...
Went QPR’s ground last year with some young people on a summer camp. The away dressing room was awful. Real basic and uncomfortable. With a urinal in the main seating area. I think all clubs potentially do this. Small margins and all that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.