Rate The Players v Guiseley (Away)
- Thread starter Scotimp
- Start date
Farman.....5.5 Had very little to do.
Beevers.....5.5 Handled Clee reasonably well (more so in the first half)
Waterfall...6.5 Dealt well with the aerial threat of Rankine
Raggett.....6.5 Formed a good combo with Luke to nullify Boyes and Rankine
Habergham...5.5 Provided a good outlet when breaking, but goal did come from his side.
Wood.......5.5 Combative as ever, but suffered head injury. Overhit a couple of through balls.
Woodyard...6.5 Great physical presence in the middle and kept us ticking over in possession.
Anderson....7 Constant threat with his direct running, strength and shooting. Reminds me of Gareth.
Hawkridge...6 Some nice touches in the first half.
Rhead.......6.5 Won everything in the air. Looked energetic and sharp.
Robinson....7 Displayed pace and both goals showed a touch of class.
The scoreline doesn't really reflect our superiority. Guiseley created very little, but we made hard work of it in the end because rather than go for the jugular and the third goal, when we broke on an exposed defence, we seemed more content with keeping possession for another 30 seconds than playing the final ball.
Beevers.....5.5 Handled Clee reasonably well (more so in the first half)
Waterfall...6.5 Dealt well with the aerial threat of Rankine
Raggett.....6.5 Formed a good combo with Luke to nullify Boyes and Rankine
Habergham...5.5 Provided a good outlet when breaking, but goal did come from his side.
Wood.......5.5 Combative as ever, but suffered head injury. Overhit a couple of through balls.
Woodyard...6.5 Great physical presence in the middle and kept us ticking over in possession.
Anderson....7 Constant threat with his direct running, strength and shooting. Reminds me of Gareth.
Hawkridge...6 Some nice touches in the first half.
Rhead.......6.5 Won everything in the air. Looked energetic and sharp.
Robinson....7 Displayed pace and both goals showed a touch of class.
The scoreline doesn't really reflect our superiority. Guiseley created very little, but we made hard work of it in the end because rather than go for the jugular and the third goal, when we broke on an exposed defence, we seemed more content with keeping possession for another 30 seconds than playing the final ball.
Farman 6.5 - pretty much untroubled, but did close down a shot well, in the first half
Beevers 7 - another good showing
Waterfall 6 - good game, gave as good as he got with the big fella up front
Raggett 6 - ditto
Habergham 6.5 - got forward well
Wood 7 - as always put everything in and put his body on the line when needed
Woodyard 8 - this lad is different class, hope we can keep him beyond January!
Hawkridge 6.5 - better performance than Saturday, the late miss maybe explains why he is reluctant to shoot!
Rhead 7 - won his share of header, some nice flicks with his feet and put the second goal on a plate
Robinson 8 - MOM for me, worked his nads off and 2 well taken goals
Anderson 8 - constant threat and even though the LB dealt with him better than Saturday he was still a handful
Beevers 7 - another good showing
Waterfall 6 - good game, gave as good as he got with the big fella up front
Raggett 6 - ditto
Habergham 6.5 - got forward well
Wood 7 - as always put everything in and put his body on the line when needed
Woodyard 8 - this lad is different class, hope we can keep him beyond January!
Hawkridge 6.5 - better performance than Saturday, the late miss maybe explains why he is reluctant to shoot!
Rhead 7 - won his share of header, some nice flicks with his feet and put the second goal on a plate
Robinson 8 - MOM for me, worked his nads off and 2 well taken goals
Anderson 8 - constant threat and even though the LB dealt with him better than Saturday he was still a handful
