Rate The Players v Barrow | Vital Football

Rate The Players v Barrow

Scotimp

Vital Football Legend
Open for ratings, and don't forget to add your comments too:

Farman
Wood
Bush
Howe
Waterfall
Stanley
Sparrow
Muldoon
Hawkridge
Rhead
Reid

Robinson
Everington
 
Hate going first

Farman = 6 Not much to do apart from goals
Wood - 5 Poorest game I've seen from him
Bush - 5 Looked off the pace
Howe - 6
Waterfall - 6
Stanley - 6
Sparrow - 6
Muldoon - 6 Good runs early on but not given ball 2nd half
Hawkridge - 6
Rhead - 8
Reid - 6 Good early touches but again didn't notice him much 2nd half but should have won pen

Robinson - 6
Everington - 6
 
Farman - 6 - Not much to do, seemed a little uncertain with some Barrow set-pieces.
Wood - 5 - Poor challenge for the pen.
Bush - 6 - Did well to keep trying and making things happen.
Howe - 6 - I never notice him, but I guess that's a good thing.
Waterfall - 6 - Solid enough for the most part.
Stanley - 6
Sparrow - 6
Muldoon - 6.5 - Good at taking people on but sometimes takes a touch too many.
Hawkridge - 6.5 - Faded a little but I'd certainly rather have him in the team than not.
Rhead - 7.5 - Two excellent goals, seemed to struggle to keep it up for 90 minutes.
Reid - 6 - Fairly quiet but unlucky not to get a pen.

Robinson - 6 - Did well.
Everington - 6 - I'm just pleased he's alright after that potential leg-breaker.
 
Farman- 6- couple of good saves but not his best game
Wood- 6- not bad but didn't organise enough in my opinion
Waterfall- 7- battled well
Howe- 5- struggled occasionally
Bush- 5- always worry he's more concerned with running forwards than defending
Stanley- 6- steady, does the unnoticed well, hard task to lead defence and midfield. Didn't really manage it though.
Sparrow- 6- epitomised a 6/10.
Muldoon- 7- don't mind him losing it. Unfussy running adds another element to our attack.
Hawkridge- 6- not his brilliant best, nor his anonymous worst
Reid- 5- not bad bad, but just can't offer what Hearn can (he may not be in good books at the moment but we miss him badly)
Rhead- 9- don't understand how it can be less. We kick the ball to him and he the majority of the time he flicks it to a Hearn-shaped hole or scores.

Everington- 6- for a few seconds I thought we might not see him pull the short on again, horrific challenge.
Robinson- 5- an unsurprising amount of effort with an equally unsurprising lack of impact
 
Farman - 6 not convincing on crosses but kicking and communication has improved.
Wood - 5 to fired up from the off causing him to lose concentration with the job in hand
Bush - 6 did ok
Howe - 6 mixed bag
Waterfall - 6 as above
Stanley - 6 reasonably in control
Sparrow - 7 thought he was doing well when he was taken off
Muldoon - 6 bright early on then faded
Hawkridge - 6 good crossing and busy around the pitch
Rhead - 9 won EVERY header and two goals, what more can we ask
Reid - busy, quite nippy but not sure on his finishing after been put through on goal

Robinson - 5 want it to work for him but just not happening
Everington - 6 looked to be involved straight away

 
Red Wimp - 21/12/2015 19:44

Hate going first

Farman = 6 Not much to do apart from goals
Wood - 5 Poorest game I've seen from him
Bush - 5 Looked off the pace
Howe - 6
Waterfall - 6
Stanley - 6
Sparrow - 6
Muldoon - 6 Good runs early on but not given ball 2nd half
Hawkridge - 6
Rhead - 8
Reid - 6 Good early touches but again didn't notice him much 2nd half but should have won pen

Robinson - 6
Everington - 6
As above but 7 for Muldoon
 
Farman - 6 - Doesn't command his box enough
Wood - 4 Really poor, discipline was shocking.
Bush - 5 a threat going forward, but defensively...
Howe - 6 - Adequate
Waterfall - 6 - As above
Stanley - 7 - Look so much better with him in the team
Sparrow - 6.5 - Needs Stanley playing with him.
Muldoon - 6.5 - As ever, worked hard.
Hawkridge - 5.5 - Always flatters to deceive
Rhead - 8 - In every sense of the word, a colussus.
Reid - 6.5 - More to come from him. Looks an intelligent player.

Robinson - 5 - The party's over
Everington - 6 Always trying, not sure about the quality