Haha, Notty. Beat ya!
Here's the thing, though. I'm only using 4 numbers and I'm still doing better than half the field. Next year I may limit myself to 3.
Damn you! ? At least you have a formula of sorts, rather than my random guesswork. Back to the drawing board
Here's the thing, though. I'm only using 4 numbers and I'm still doing better than half the field. Next year I may limit myself to 3.
Sorry to pop your bubble, Notty, but quite a lot of those below you could best be described as 'occasional predictors'....
I see no points awarded for participation rates.
You make a very valid point, good sir..... I may yet consider this at the end of the season if I and my spreadsheet are still on good terms.
You need some form of weighted-average deviation measure. Essentially, the most deviant contributors should lose.