Possession based football - Over-hyped, pointless? | Vital Football

Possession based football - Over-hyped, pointless?

Spursex

Alert Team
Ever since the dawn of Barca's possession based football, the top clubs appear to have been trying to emulate it..

Nothing frustrates as much as seeing us having 60-70% of the ball and not getting the end product...

So have Poch got it wrong, are the disciples of Bielsa false prophets?


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-c...king-showed-pointlessness-possession-without/

How Russia's counter-attacking showed pointlessness of possession without purpose

1
TELEMMGLPICT000166364977_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqS8LvVGaCov9_zEWH2d7j7f7uG-EXu1vQjA186ek-eCk.jpeg
Russia kicked off the World Cup with a 5-0 win over Saudi Arabia Credit: Reuters

14 June 2018 • 6:11pm
There will not be many occasions when Saudi Arabia’s players have enjoyed 62 per cent of the possession on the home turf of a European opponent and yet for much of the first half, as the world watched Russia kick-off its own tournament, the team in green had the ball.

This is the way that so many modern managers aspire to play, and when they watch the best teams in the world it is easy to see why. Possession football is well established as the game’s purest form - the right way to win and perhaps even the right way to lose. Its arch exponents, like Pep Guardiola, coach sides that take the possession count up past 70 per cent over 90 minutes, denying opponents all but a foothold in the game.

At club and international level, in the long term it feels like a solid basis on which to build, from junior football upwards. It is just that unless you have the kind of players at the disposal of the top coaches then it can be a road to nowhere.
In the World Cup finals’ opening game, between two very mediocre sides, Saudi Arabia’s five-man midfield passed the ball well in the first half and still went in two goals down. Salman Alfaraj and Yahya Alsheri are players who are comfortable on the ball - it is where it goes after them which is the problem.
Their striker Mohammed Alsahlawi has 28 goals in 40 caps - albeit eight in two matches against East Timor - and trained with Manchester United this season. Yet he probably had more shots per session at Carrington than he managed this afternoon.



In contrast, Russia picked off their opponents on the counter-attack, running through a paper-thin defensive line and finishing well - never more so than the second from substitute Denis Cheryshev. They let Saudi to have the ball and then moved it forward quickly even if they themselves lacked true pace in attack. Arguably their most talented player after Alan Dzagoev, injured on 23 minutes, is Aleksandr Golovin and he does not have the extra gear to glide past defenders.


When they did create openings in the first half, for midfielder Iury Gazinsky and then Cheryshev, Russia took them well. For Saudi there was just no cutting edge. In a game that was generally low on quality they tried to take care in possession but lost confidence and their defensive weakness let in another Russia substitute, Artem Dzyuba, to head in the third.



The second goal for Cheryshev, hit with the outside of his left foot in time added on at the end was the game’s moment of true quality before Golovin struck the fifth from a free-kick. Saudi were hopeless by the end, finishing with a possession count that was bigger and not a shot on target.
 
It's worth mentioning that pointless possession is now used to rest with the ball. It looks like a team is going nowhere but after the high, intense pressing without the ball it's what's teams do after the opposition has got their shape back. Counter attacking is about resting without the ball and getting back in shape.

Personally, I'd like to see Spurs do the equivalent of switching between orthodox and southpaw at boxing. If we could play with the high intensity pressing and then sit back for a few minutes and concede possession playing counter, that would be another string to our bow. Sometimes we're too predictable and we can't get through the parked bus.

Either way, if you're up against a poor defence like Russia were then the goals will come. Will be interesting to see what happens with England in the Belgium game. I can't think that England will have more possession than Belgium but do think we can get at their full backs from wide positions on the counter.
 
Possession football is good if you play at a good tempo. But slow boring football when you need to score really is something we need to stop doing.

In the games against the weaker sides we have done this far too often and we end up drawing as teams just find it easy to defend against.

The slow possession football has it's place, especially when your winning and trying to take the sting out of a game. But only in small doses.

We looked great against Dortmund and Madrid at times playing counter attacking football. Under Harry as well, teams just can't cope with it. United under Fergie were great to watch as well.

As Mutters says we should certainly mix our game up more often. We will be even harder to beat if we do.
 
Agree with all that RD. Sometimes it seems really odd when the players pass it slowly and there's no movement. Appreciate if the oppo defend deep and are well organised it's not as simple as it looks to create space but sometimes it feels like we don't get out of 3rd gear
 
I will start by echoing what freundorfoe says...umm this is Saudi we are talking about...so I don't put much stake in that.

But on the topic of possession football. What has always frustrated me is when we have 70-80% possession, 20+ shots, and either draw or lose. This is unsat.

Possession is great but only with a finishing product.

I think the great teams are good at multiple styles and can flex as needed throughout the match, based on your opposition weaknesses.
 
Possession should be used to wear the opposition down and eventually create more options and chances. Goals scored should be in a ratio to possession kept (not 70% possession, 1 goal). If the purpose of possession ends up being not to lose possession, then it turns in on itself. We have definitely ended up here sometimes with teams like WBA, Southampton, Swansea, Stoke set up to contain this tendency.