Politics | Page 25 | Vital Football

Politics

Starmer was a communist for half his life, Rachel Reeves was a customer services manager - both have lied through their teeth about their past, so could just be the lure of power, but it might well be also much more deeper than that.

But if it was a lure of power, surely he'd be doing several different things. Either appealing to everyone with extremely popular decisions or using charisma to "divide and conquer" in the same way Trump, Farage or Bolsonaro do. You don't hold on to power by making deeply unpopular decisions across the board and Starmer couldn't be further away from being a populist. That makes zero sense. Anything "deeper" just feels unlikely.

A communist he isn't though. Socialist yes, but Labour has always been a socialist party at its core. Only Blair pulled the party to the centre.
 
I don't feel comfortable supporting the party i've always followed when they're making as many poor decisions as they are. And for a man who says he puts country before party he sure has a funny way of showing it.

The BBC! They won't even call out Hamas for what they really are.

I do agree with you regarding Musk. I wouldn't take kindly to him meddling in our affairs either but when it comes off the back of the resulting arrests during the riots i can understand his concern. Obviously violent behaviour needs to be punished but offensive tweets are taking things a step too far. To then go on & give convicted criminals early releases in order to make room for these people was nothing short of a farce.

But that's good that you are disagreeing with the party you've always followed! I strongly believe that anyone who votes for the party who get in to power should be the ones to hold the party to higher account than anyone else. You gave them your trust and it is your right to demand it much, much more. I am so strongly against entrenchment. I've voted Labour and Lib Dem, backwards and forwards all my life. If Rory Stewart had become Tory leader instead of that dolt Boris, I would have voted Tory.

The BBC cannot win in that issue. Nobody can. The BBC, from what I have witnessed since the beginning of this situation, have reported the atrocities of what Hamas did and now report the atrocities of what Israel are doing. If they show to much support for Israel they get shot at for being islamaphobes and in support of genocide, if they show support for Palastinean's they instantly get branded anti-Semites and terrorist sympathisers. The narrative is cursed so all they can do is report what they see.

I do get what you mean about the arrests Vs criminal release but even that is messy. The riots were beyond appalling and we were seeing a genuine violence and destruction. They should be punished. Once again though, narrative is cursed. The prisons were so overloaded, so did they release murders or did they release low level criminals? I'm still not sure. The tweets thing - were they "just" tweets or were they more?

But fuck Musk. He has no right. He should stick to meming and sharing misinformation with the oh so intelligent input of "hmm" or "interesting".
 

The real question about Rachel Reeves’s CV​

To begin with, I was appalled that anyone would even dream of suggesting Rachel Reeves lied on her CV. How dare they show such disrespect to the first woman to win the Victoria Cross, the Turner Prize and Premier League Goal of the Month.
Sadly, however, I’m beginning to fear that there might be something in this story after all. Until very recently, Ms Reeves’s profile on LinkedIn boasted that from 2006-09 she was an “economist” at Bank of Scotland. Yet it’s now been reported that her job was merely in customer relations.
I can see why politicians might wish to embellish their CVs. In the same position, I’d much rather that voters thought my job title was “economist”. Because then I could go around saying, “I was an economist, so I know how to run the economy.” Which sounds rather more impressive than, for example, “I was a head of customer relations, so I know how to record this call for training or monitoring purposes.”
Anyway, we shouldn’t necessarily assume that Ms Reeves is a liar. It’s possible that she’s simply a harmless, Walter Mitty-style fantasist. Then again, Walter Mitty fantasised about exciting things, such as being a fighter pilot or an assassin. If Ms Reeves only fantasises about being an economist at Bank of Scotland, this suggests an alarming lack of imagination.
Either way, the real problem with this peculiar episode is that it could undermine public trust. After all, if we can’t be sure that Ms Reeves was an economist at Bank of Scotland, we can’t be sure about anything she says. In fact, are we absolutely sure that she’s Chancellor?
She regularly professes to be, but I’m starting to wonder. Last month, the Telegraph revealed that Ms Reeves claimed £1,225 on expenses to pay someone else to help file her tax return. Is that really a task with which an actual Chancellor of the Exchequer would require professional assistance? It’s like a Cambridge professor of mathematics needing help with his 10 times table, or a farmer having to google how many legs a cow has.
The Prime Minister must clear up this mystery, and fast. Until he does so, suspicions are bound to grow that Ms Reeves is only pretending to be Chancellor in order to burnish her CV, and thus land a better job. Such as economist at Bank of Scotland.

Way of the World is a twice-weekly satirical look at the headlines aiming to mock the absurdities of the modern world. It is published at 7am every Tuesday and Saturday
 
Barry Goldwater, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Mitt Romney…and Donald Trump have all been called “fascists” by the Democrats. That’s right, the Washington Examiner documented the history of the Democrat playbook which demonizes Republican presidential candidates.
 
Barry Goldwater, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Mitt Romney…and Donald Trump have all been called “fascists” by the Democrats. That’s right, the Washington Examiner documented the history of the Democrat playbook which demonizes Republican presidential candidates.
Well the grown ups have entered the room again. Let the kids carry on with their scrawling.
 
The DisInformation Chronicle
Trump Camp: British Censorship Group to be "Investigated From All Angles"
Britain's Center for Countering Digital Hate will be at the "top of the list" of Trump investigatory targets, sources say after Disinformation Chronicle/Racket story.


Matt Taibbi
and
Paul D. Thacker
Oct 23, 2024

6 minute read​


The Center for Countering Digital Hate will be “investigated from all angles,” a source from the campaign of Donald Trump says, in response to documents obtained by the Disinformation Chronicle in conjunction with Racket showing “Kill Musk’s Twitter” as the top annual priority on CCDH’s monthly agenda notes for 2024.

The Trump campaign is furious that a group tied to Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s new government is targeting its political allies while parent organization Labour Together openly advises Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. Such blatant foreign influence frustrates Trump operatives, since they faced years of relentless and ultimately fruitless


The rest is here:

 
News leaking that Musk may donate $100 mill to Reform - If he does this, I can't pretend, I'd be delighted. I hope it's true.
 
News leaking that Musk may donate $100 mill to Reform - If he does this, I can't pretend, I'd be delighted. I hope it's true.
I'm not a fan of Farage, nor am i a supporter of Reform but my God something has to give. Starmer is showing the world what a 2 faced weasel he really is. Even still i'd sooner he was taken down by his inner circle, as unlikely as that may seem at the moment.
 
It already is.

No, I mean fuuuuuuucked. Like "welcome to America" fucked. Completely privatised healthcare that only very wealthy can afford. The villainisation of anybody who requires any kind of financial support - disabilities, maternity, unemployment through no fault of their own etc. The man is completely soulless. I met him once and he is one of the most repugnant people I have ever met.

No word of a lie, if he becomes PM, I will do everything I can to leave this country. Cameron, May, Sunak, Starmer - I can at least see a tiny bit of good intention in them. Farage has none.