Melon Donkey
I am a little bit perplexed
This is going to be do much fun watching Starmer destroy Johnson time and again at the dispatch box. Starmer will have had far more difficult tests in court.
This is going to be do much fun watching Starmer destroy Johnson time and again at the dispatch box. Starmer will have had far more difficult tests in court.
Im not sure i would trust this woman to wash my car on the drive never mind be a minister and help run the country.
After two woeful showings being interviewed by Piers and making herself look ridiculous she once again makes herself look unemployable.
And this is who we trust to run the country. When i eventually move and live in another country i will laugh at this government one day.
https://news.sky.com/video/can-you-stick-the-blame-on-the-scientists-12003293
Im not sure i would trust this woman to wash my car on the drive never mind be a minister and help run the country.
After two woeful showings being interviewed by Piers and making herself look ridiculous she once again makes herself look unemployable.
And this is who we trust to run the country. When i eventually move and live in another country i will laugh at this government one day.
https://news.sky.com/video/can-you-stick-the-blame-on-the-scientists-12003293
I reckon once we scratch below the surface of a very professional SAGE group of speakers and given time, we’ll hear lots more about the handling of this epidemic. They (advisors) seem to be too professional and lack a bit of character to run off to the Sunday Times for an exclusive on dishing the dirt but I imagine there’s a lot disgruntlement with those advising versus those making the decisions.
The two groups have never tied up, and there have been too many straplines the advisors are regurgitating that they don’t really believe.
Just my opinion
I guess the deal for scientific advisors is that you get to give your advice but then have to go along with whatever the politicians decide.
Just picking up from Corona thread Wurz.
What I can say is Neil Ferguson's reputation is in tatters, the bloke who predicted 500000 deaths and then thought so little of the danger he went shagging a married woman, very trust worthy!
---------
Even as somebody whose been mixed with the Gov response so far when it comes to criticism, how can you be so declarative about Ferguson's reputation when an affair in no way diminishes his status as an expert - yet Bojo can seemingly get away with everything from lying, racism, buffoonery, ignoring the guidance himself - let alone he can hardly hang himself up as a paragon of faith, respect when it comes to his own affairs.
Scientists have levelled a flurry of criticism against Professor Neil Ferguson's modelling which warned 500,000 people could die from coronavirus and prompted Britain to go into lockdown.
Modelling from Imperial College London epidemiologist Professor Ferguson, who stepped down from the government's Sage group at the start of May, has been described as 'totally unreliable' by other experts.
David Richards, co-founder of British data technology company WANdisco said the model was a 'buggy mess that looks more like a bowl of angel hair pasta than a finely tuned piece of programming'.
He said: 'In our commercial reality we would fire anyone for developing code like this and any business that relied on it to produce software for sale would likely go bust.