PL clubs racing towards Bankruptcy..

Spursex

Alert Team
Since the PL started, 22 clubs have believed they can 'buy their way to success' - all now languish in the lower leagues after failing and financially hit the reality wall....most have had to be turned around from collapse.

Now after all that (you'd think some would have learned by now to live within their means) there are still advocates (and some short sighted fans, so they're I good company) of building a future by laying their foundations on financial quicksand...

...and now we have yet another professional siren warning to the PL and it's clubs:






Financial report claims Premier League clubs are hurtling towards bankruptcy
July 10 2017, 00:18Football
Premier League


Premier League clubs are hurtling towards bankruptcy due to chronic overspending, according to a new report by financial analysts Vysyble.

The report also claims the long-term implications of those losses could be a breakaway by the league's biggest clubs and the creation of a European Super League.

Titled 'We're so Rich it's Unbelievable', the document is based on the accounts of all Premier League clubs between 2008/09 and 2015/16, the last season for which data is available.

Based on the principle of "economic profit" - the difference between revenue and costs, including the so-called "opportunity of cost" of not doing something else with your money – the report claims Premier League clubs lost £2billion in eight years.

One of the report's co-authors, Roger Bell, said: "Financially, football is failing. Britain's biggest football clubs are spending much, much more than they are making.

"The Premier League, and its executive chairman Richard Scudamore, should be very worried.

"Our analysis shows clubs are losing a record £876,700 every single day. Despite TV bringing in huge amounts of cash every year, it does not meet the many millions spent on players' wages.

"Clubs needs to face reality about their dire financial situation before they can't afford to pay the bills and some go to the wall."

This stark warning runs counter to most recent analyses of the Premier League's financial health, with many experts pointing to restrictions on excessive spending introduced after Portsmouth's collapse in 2012 and the gravity-defying rise in broadcast revenues.

But Vysyble's John Purcell told Press Association Sport he and Bell disagree with the view that football clubs are better run now than they were a decade ago.

"Most of them are spending a lot more than they're taking in," said Purcell.

"Across the league, clubs are losing £8.80 for every £100 they bring in, and that's based on 2015-16. I suspect it will be more like £12-13 now. The game is facing massive financial and structural risk."

Purcell said only five clubs made an economic profit in 2015/16, the worst performance since 2012/13, with Chelsea and Manchester City accounting for more than half of the league's total losses over the report's eight-year period.

The report's findings, however, will raise eyebrows among many fans, as it ranks relegated Norwich City ahead of champions Leicester City in its 'Profitability Index' for 2015/16 and notes that Blackpool managed five straight years in profit as they plummeted down the league pyramid.

The report does, though, commend Burnley for their sustainable approach, point out that Leicester managed the rare feat of making a profit while winning the league and say Spurs are the most profitable club since 2008.

The real crunch for the Premier League, according to Bell and Purcell, will come when the 70 per cent three-yearly increases in domestic TV rights dry up.

Purcell said: "We're getting to the point where the cycle of ever bigger domestic TV deals is unsustainable.

"I think we've had seven renewals since 1991 and they work to a formula - if we follow the trend, the next deal will have to clear £8billion.

"I don't think there is any way BT or Sky can commit to that kind of money. OK, you can put on more live games, and we've seen that trend already, but ultimately dilutes the product.

"I suspect we are heading towards a European Super League where the new breed of owners, many of them from North America, can organise the type of league they know and understand: fixed squads, salary caps, big TV events.

"That is when I think the likes of Amazon, Google and Facebook would get interested in football rights."

Bell added: "The EPL was formed to gain increased monies from broadcasting. There is nothing to stop the top six or seven clubs breaking away and joining forces with other top clubs from Italy, Spain, Germany etc, forming a European Super League and negotiating a Europe-wide or even global TV deal for many, many billions of pounds."

Press Association Sport has asked the Premier League for its response to the survey.
 
80deg16minW - 10/7/2017 15:07

Did you buy the report?

Didn't need to this time; it's #325.00 but it covers all the ground and the sort of analysis I do myself every year: Seriously, there is nothing in this report you can't work out for yourself if you read each PL clubs accounts and compare them in both the current period and historically, as I do with my BI tools. Of greater interest is building intelligent forecast models and perhaps how many PL clubs you can find that are skirting with eventual near collapse (so will add to the 22) unless they radically alter their structure(s), some of course will get lucky and be bought by foreign owners willing to buy success, but as we've seen, far too many of them get bored or give up when success isn't instant...


Anyway, this is what you'll get for your money if you want to spend it:

In this 42-page report, we have examined in detail the statement of accounts and balance sheets from clubs that have been participants in the English Premier League since the 2008-9 season. With data from over 260 individual balance sheets, we have been able to calculate the economic performance for each club where all taxes and charges including the cost of capital have been considered. The report also introduces the Football Profitability Index (FPI) which illustrates the efficiency of each participant club in turning revenue into economic profit on a like-for-like basis.

Contents include:

A detailed explanation of the methodology used to calculate economic profit and the FPI

A review of the revenue performance of the Premier League division and individual clubs therein

How the Premier League division has performed in terms of generating economic profits since 2008-9

An illustration of the key economic trends within the division

An introduction to the FPI and the overall efficiency of the division year-on-year in achieving economic profits/losses

A detailed comparison between FPI performance and Premier League standings at club level for the 2015-16 season

FPI performance profiles for Premier League title-winning clubs – what does it cost to win?

Relegation – the link with poor FPI performance

The two-tier league – an explanation of the differing financial dynamics at work as illustrated by FPI data and trends
 
The Chavs and City are old style ownership. They are toys/hobbies for their owners. They own it for ego purposes and will fund whatever is necessary and try to figure a way around any funding regulatory obstacles so they can keep on winning.

So to apply a business model to those clubs is not facing the reality of the situation.
 
Nick Real Deal - 10/7/2017 22:51

Nick Real Deal - 10/7/2017 20:03

Chavs and City of course follow the Ioan formula.

That's Ioan with a capital i not Loan.

Got it. :15: But Ioan is correct. These teams are bankrolling what successes they have had. This isn't about good business. This is about owning a winning team.
 
80deg16minW - 10/7/2017 23:16

Nick Real Deal - 10/7/2017 22:51

Nick Real Deal - 10/7/2017 20:03

Chavs and City of course follow the Ioan formula.

That's Ioan with a capital i not Loan.

Got it. :15: But Ioan is correct. These teams are bankrolling what successes they have had. This isn't about good business. This is about owning a winning team.

When you've got so much money that it isn't even a meaningful commodity to you then the way you get your kicks is to buy success no matter what the costs - it happened in Horse racing and it's happened in football - you just get extremely rick oil related people/families buying to have something to talk about during the week....

Competing against it is virtually impossible, unless you have a blood line/blood stock that has a history of success....
 
^ Thats funny I was going to use horse racing as an example. It is exactly the same thing.
 
What could OUR maximum net spend on players be and still keep within current FFP rules? Has anyone calculated it?