Spursex - 15/5/2017 18:36
Bald Archie - 15/5/2017 18:31
Spursex - 15/5/2017 10:33
Big Chiv - 12/5/2017 21:46
Bald Archie - 12/5/2017 21:37
Perspective...I like that.
At the start of the season many thought that Ars*nal would still be what they have been for 20 years, that City and United and Chelsea would be back and that Liverpool would be a huge threat.
None of those things happened and, trust me, that wasn't because of Porky.
We have improved this year as a team and I even think Porky has progressed as a manager, BUT you have to be blind to think that we have moved onto a really high level - check out our abject performances in the EL and CL for proof. The fact is the others have largely been pretty awful and left a bit of a domestic vacuum, which we have taken advanatage whilst still contriving to f'up all the competitions other than the PL.
Next season in their 2nd year Mourinho, Pep and Conte will be even more settled and quite likely to be rapidly catching up the lost ground. As for Ars*nal......depends on who is managing. What will we do?
Uncle Joe will sell a few and have us playing at Wembley while the new stadium is being made ready so he can line his pockets, that's all he's ever done.
That's an interesting 'perspective' on old Joe; whilst he may not have injected vast sums, he's pocketed SFA...(so far)...
His pay-off or more likely his heirs will be when the club eventually gets sold.
Presumably you have looked through all of the accounts since they bought control to know that?
His aim is to work his way ever higher in the list of the Worlds Richest Men, and that has taken place year on year aided by the significant increase in value of the Spurs related. That has always been the plan and he may never trouse the money before he dies but that is irrelevant. What is relevant is that the aim was not to buy us with a view to becoming an on-field footballing collosus.
Yes, I've analysed the accounts every year since ENIC bought the club, I've done the same with ENIC's...
As for his motives or Levy's or what they weren't or were prepared to do/risk, that too has been done to death here many a time.
They run the club as a properly constituted business, some liked it, some didn't. During their time there's been a number of spectacular billionaire fails, and at least one spectacular success.
Many a fan were/are proud of the fact that we didn't have a sugar-daddy that threw money at the club, just as many wanted a sugar daddy and still do....
So you decide what side of that debate you're on, I did a long time ago.