Pants or no Pants ?

Should we sign him?

  • Yes. Sign him up.

    Votes: 28 84.8%
  • No. Pants is pants.

    Votes: 2 6.1%
  • Not bothered either way.

    Votes: 3 9.1%

  • Total voters
    33
I hope if your parents die or your child is sick then people are equally understanding you miserable ****. Try some empathy for a change. Why not join in the usual characters & make something up about cocaine addiction.

Sign him up he’s quality.
 
I think we should sign him, he's a good keeper at this level.

Not sure we should be concerned with his absence. We don't know what the issue is and it could well be that with nothing left to play for AK simply told him to take the rest of the season off.
 
I hope if your parents die or your child is sick then people are equally understanding you miserable ****. Try some empathy for a change. Why not join in the usual characters & make something up about cocaine addiction.

Sign him up he’s quality.


Oh piss off.

What I mean is that as fans rather than employers we have no way of knowing what the issue is, how serious, how it will affect him or for how long and therefore no real way of knowing whether a permenent transfer is the right thing to do.
 
It is a hot day but not going commando. Keep pants on I reckon.An assured experienced keeper is just what we need.
 
Don’t think he will cost much so if he wants to come then yeah he is more than good enough for this division.

Smith needs loaning out and Kapinos I am not sure yet but think he could be good competition for Pants at least.
 
Oh piss off.

What I mean is that as fans rather than employers we have no way of knowing what the issue is, how serious, how it will affect him or for how long and therefore no real way of knowing whether a permenent transfer is the right thing to do.

Not going into this any further. Pantz is quality & I wish him well with whatever issue he has. You are an idiot.
 
~1981~
•Prince of England gets married
•Liverpool win The Champions League.
•The Pope shot.

~2005~
•Prince of England gets married.
•Liverpool win the champions league.
•The Pope dies.

~2018~
•Prince of England due to be married.
•Liverpool in the final of The Champions League.
• We can only hope.....
 
Not going into this any further. Pantz is quality & I wish him well with whatever issue he has. You are an idiot.

If you are that concerned about him then why are you trying to make this thread into an argument with me?

I voted yes by the way.

He has been an excellent keeper in the main. The first for a long time that I trust with crosses, although he sometimes struggles to get down low. If the management have no concerns then we should definitely sign him.

He is probably the loanee I would most want to keep
 
~1981~
•Prince of England gets married
•Liverpool win The Champions League.
•The Pope shot.

~2005~
•Prince of England gets married.
•Liverpool win the champions league.
•The Pope dies.

~2018~
•Prince of England due to be married.
•Liverpool in the final of The Champions League.
• We can only hope.....

Telling another member that you hope they die this year is appropriate is it?

That's from the Da Fuq school of posting. Unbelievable
 
If we get him (or another keeper), or Kapino leaves (and Smith goes on loan), or Smith remains as backup and Kapino leave. From what I saw from Kapino, I think that, yes, Smith is slightly better...I even think that he would have faired better in the last games, playing with no pressure ...gents we have to keep in mind that Smith was our keeper in the most important game in the last years and if it wasnt for him maybe this season we played L1 football. AK has to make up his mind with the fella (Smith), or back up to Pants (or another senior keeper) or should be allowed to go on loan and play regular football...Smith had to endure months of a manager saying openly that he is looking for another keeper (that never came), and still performed reasonably well, to not even making the bench !!!
 
Telling another member that you hope they die this year is appropriate is it?

That's from the Da Fuq school of posting. Unbelievable

You do realise you aren’t the actual Pope, I know you’re mental but that’s taking it a bit far...


Also it’s probably only you on this whole forum that wants the scousers to win the champions league as most people don’t like people always playing the victim.
 
What i dont understand abour kapino is that smith under AK would have been a much better player. It was warbs that messed with his game by insisting that he distributed the ball rather that punting it long.

Nothing wrong with smith as a no2 so why the need for kapino at all?
 
What i dont understand abour kapino is that smith under AK would have been a much better player. It was warbs that messed with his game by insisting that he distributed the ball rather that punting it long.

Nothing wrong with smith as a no2 so why the need for kapino at all?

By the time he was dropped Smith was costing us too many goals, and not even from the distribution.

His hesitancy for one was fatal.