Does anybody know how much this loan is we owe to the Premier League?
I don't see Evans as a coach, perhaps Rayner may be. It's difficult to describe Evans coaching ability, players seem to like playing for him but I don't see him being the one to get us out of our current predicament.Whatever you want to say about Scally good or bad - Evans has signed all these current players he demolished the original squad and has bought his own players in over the past 2/3 seasons. His style is to get in as many as he can muster and offload the ones that don’t work out. Well I think most of us could manage that model and make a half decent effort. The coaching of the players and style is down to Evans and Rayner - no one else - we all know you have to manage a squad but to have 10 injured players takes some doing ? Ie did he bring in the wrong players to begin with ? We all know when you struggle in the lower 6 clubs - little tends to go you’re way. We’ve all made similar comments as such in the past when we’ve struggled with previous managers. The buck has to stop with evans on this one he bought Akinde in and it’s not Scally’s or the fans fault he can’t hit a barn door with a banjo ?. On balance there’s been some very good signings but overall he’s made some bad decisions and wasted funds. When the Evans merry go round of players coming and going stops - quite simply he struggles. That being said I want him to ‘ coach ‘ these players and get them back to winning ways. I don’t want Gills to drop down to league 2 and I’m sure neither does anyone else. Of the team is winning a lot of fans will come back. Let’s be honest some of his hoof ball techniques he’s employed in the early season has been pretty dire. Although I don’t like him or his style I still want the team to do well. It’s those horrible 0-1 losses like yesterday that get to me when we should have got a result.
Evans had us well organised. But we simply have nobody with confidence in front of goal.That is mainly a financial thing.Yes he could have gone for other players and personally I feel we desperately need to try to move a few on in January especially Akinde in my view.I don't see Evans as a coach, perhaps Rayner may be. It's difficult to describe Evans coaching ability, players seem to like playing for him but I don't see him being the one to get us out of our current predicament.
He also needs to stop alienating other coaching teams.
Was that the Belarusian Diplomatic Service?I believe Evans gave up the Diplomatic service so that he could advance the cause of football, raise the standard of coaching and ensure that managers get the respect they deserve.
Hey! Respect to those guys and girls. Difficult hand to play. Now what’s the boss gone and done? etcWas that the Belarusian Diplomatic Service?
Embargo means we can only make signings in the transfer windows. Also we are limited on first team squad size to either 23 or 24 players, depending on whether you believe the EFL rules or what Scally said on his last chat.
Yes true. So that massively restricts who we can sign of course.And any loans we bring in have to have all their wages paid by the parent club.
Yes true. So that massively restricts who we can sign of course.
A big reason for keeping SE IMO. His contact book might be critical in getting a couple in on loan (once Kelman and A.N Other loans finish in Jan).Will still be a tough ask though.
Certainly Norwich look at the style of football before sending a player on loan.I would guess that the Adshead deal was only agreed as he was a defensive midfielder. Because of the defensive direct style that Evans deploys it would make it more difficult to get smaller strikers on loan.Kelman's departure might have had a lot to do with the minutes played.But it could also have been the style of football. It need not be any clash of personality as some might have assumed.A contact book is all well and good, but you need those contacts to be in a position to help. The football industry is fluid very few coaches stay that long at any club. Managers need to persuede other clubs to loan them players, they to have a gift of the gab to do a deal not just knowing who to phone, but also have a reputation of improving players.
Certainly Norwich look at the style of football before sending a player on loan.I would guess that the Adshead deal was only agreed as he was a defensive midfielder. Because of the defensive direct style that Evans deploys it would make it more difficult to get smaller strikers on loan.Kelman's departure might have had a lot to do with the minutes played.But it could also have been the style of football. It need not be any clash of personality as some might have assumed.
re: Kelman. It could have been any of those things Chris.
But I’d have thought a 19 yo loanee who’s hardly played and never scored telling the coach to “f off” is a big reason. The fact he left a day or so later and not weeks either side tends to back that imho.