NEW KIT
- Thread starter Pie eyed
- Start date
I really like the new kits.
The only thing i'd say is i think our home kits benefit from having a little bit of a third colours to go with the blue and white. In the past we've had touch of green, yellow / gold, black or red for the trim on of the colar and sleeves and i think help to make the kit really 'pop'. Also on the stripes i always prefer when they block out the back of the shirt to be all white or blue so the numbers are easier to read. But those are relatively minor things.
Love the gold numbers on the back of the black kit, the kit in generally looks really good.
Pleased with those. Now all we need is a team to play in them!
The only thing i'd say is i think our home kits benefit from having a little bit of a third colours to go with the blue and white. In the past we've had touch of green, yellow / gold, black or red for the trim on of the colar and sleeves and i think help to make the kit really 'pop'. Also on the stripes i always prefer when they block out the back of the shirt to be all white or blue so the numbers are easier to read. But those are relatively minor things.
Love the gold numbers on the back of the black kit, the kit in generally looks really good.
Pleased with those. Now all we need is a team to play in them!
I think the fact that Morsy isn't one of the players chosen to model the kits tells you they think he's most likely going.
As it stands Garner, Jones, Pearce, Evans and Naismith i imagine are not expected to leave. But i'm sure Admin are on the phone to everyone offering them for next to nothing. So you never know.
As it stands Garner, Jones, Pearce, Evans and Naismith i imagine are not expected to leave. But i'm sure Admin are on the phone to everyone offering them for next to nothing. So you never know.
Everything must go to stop the club ceasing to exsist. You dont like the price things have been sold for, but money had to come in.
Players wanted to leave we needed money right there and right then we didnt get what a lot think the players are worth, but we was desperate.
If only one team wanted a player and we needed the money we had to take that money offered
Players wanted to leave we needed money right there and right then we didnt get what a lot think the players are worth, but we was desperate.
If only one team wanted a player and we needed the money we had to take that money offered
Last edited:
They were the ones setting the price saying that would give the buyer a clean slate. We know you cant leave admin with football creditors and cant avoid 15 point penalty without paying 25p in the pound to non football creditors. Whatever the final price of sale is needs to clear the outstanding debts. So when they said 3.5m that amount should have covered the remaining debts, which apparently it didn't.
If they said it was 6m originally but it's 3m now due to the money brought in for player sales reducing the debt that makes total sense - no issue with that. But if 3.5m was effectively the figure to clear the debts prior to raising 3m in asset sales - it makes no sense there is still 3.5m debt left after paying off 3m in debts. Even if it didn't drop 3m in price, you'd expect the price to drop by something rather than stay completely static. The original 3.5m was their number, so was their original valuation wrong or is it wrong now?
If they said it was 6m originally but it's 3m now due to the money brought in for player sales reducing the debt that makes total sense - no issue with that. But if 3.5m was effectively the figure to clear the debts prior to raising 3m in asset sales - it makes no sense there is still 3.5m debt left after paying off 3m in debts. Even if it didn't drop 3m in price, you'd expect the price to drop by something rather than stay completely static. The original 3.5m was their number, so was their original valuation wrong or is it wrong now?
Last edited:
