Stan the man would have had all of this sorted on day 1.Right chaps, this prick's had 5 week's to sort out the 20+ year mess out and done fuck all. He's got to go, who do we want to replace him? Mao? Pope? All suggestions welcome
When you take a job where the most important part of your year is the transfer window...
And that transfer window has 6 weeks left open when you are appointed...
And the squad as it is is not good enough to survive...
And five weeks into the six you have, fuck all has happened...
What do you mean "only gets one transfer window"?So a CEO only gets ONE transfer window? (that hasn't even fucking closed yet)
But IF you did decide he'd be gone in under LESS than one transfer window, yeah?What do you mean "only gets one transfer window"?
I don't decide who "gets" anything.
But if you want to see the consequences of fucking up one when you have a squad that isn't good enough to survive... Well, do you remember the league one days? I do.
No.But IF you did decide he'd be gone in under LESS than one transfer window, yeah?
No.
What makes you think that?
My happiness has nothing to do with anything.Just the way you speak. So for clarity, you're happy for Murphy to carry on?
My happiness has nothing to do with anything.
I am not generally in the habit of calling for people to be sacked, unless they happen to be a government minister.
I am critical and perhaps even angry at the lack of activity given what has happened to the squad, and the disastrous position this leaves us in. That's not the same as calling for someone to lose their job though.
I wasn't especially thrilled with his appointment in the first place and very much remain to be convincedPerhaps I came at it from the wrong angle. You say your ‘happiness’ has nothing to do with anything yet you spend all day, everyday telling us about your ‘unhappiness’ and pessimism, which you obviously think has everything to do with it. So, are you unhappy that Murphy will be our CEO tomorrow?
He didn't impress you with his work at Barnsley? Of course not. He impressed others but not you.I wasn't especially thrilled with his appointment in the first place and very much remain to be convinced
If Forest could defend in injury time, no one would have been impressed by his work at Barnsley at allHe didn't impress you with his work at Barnsley? Of course not. He impressed others but not you.
If Forest could defend in injury time, no one would have been impressed by his work at Barnsley at all
Right chaps, this prick's had 5 week's to sort out the 20+ year mess out and done fuck all. He's got to go, who do we want to replace him? Mao? Pope? All suggestions welcome
The point flies over your head like Brennan's free kick yesterday.Once again, there is no link to the CEO whatsoever.
The point flies over your head like Brennan's free kick yesterday.
If Forest could defend in injury time, Barnsley would have been relegated that day and you would never have heard of Dean Murphy at all
Says the man who thinks a highly paid CEO of a football club with 6 weeks of a transfer window to work in should have a 2 month honeymoon periodAnd again your point isn't valid. It didn't happen so you have constructed a scenario to suit your agenda.
Stick to facts popey.
Fly over my head?
Get a grip pope, you really do post utter drivel.