Napier Barracks, Folkestone | Page 17 | Vital Football

Napier Barracks, Folkestone

It was about how they were valued. Jobs obviously are different, it was a matter of how much value/worth was attrubuted to eaxh.

Historically "men's jobs" were routinely valued more highly irrespective of their worth. Employers dodged the Equal Pay Act by saying they were different jobs but (fortunately imo) it is now judged on value.

Of course it is difficult to value jobs butin general the new approach is much fairer.

By way of anecdote, many years ago a man sweeping the floor of a factory would typically be paid substantialy more than a woman cleaner who had to scrub floors and toilets.

Actually, the court has only ruled that they can pursue the claim! The next stage will be to compare the value of the jobs
 
Actually, the court has only ruled that they can pursue the claim! The next stage will be to compare the value of the jobs
Yes, correct. I should have stated that.

The principle behind the clam was most important imo. If the jobs are genuinely of different value and the difference in pay is justified, then fair enough.