Multi-National Tax net closes in..

Spursex

Alert Team
Only Ireland, Luxembourg and the Dutch all want to block this approach - I wonder why?! :10: :17:


EU to propose binding multinational tax rules - official
BRUSSELS | By Francesco Guarascio
An European Union flag flutters outside the EU Commission headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, January 12, 2016. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir
An European Union flag flutters outside the EU Commission headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, January 12, 2016.
Reuters/Francois Lenoir

The European Commission will propose a new set of binding rules by the end of January to curb corporate tax avoidance, in another move to counter unfair or illegal tax practices of multinationals, EU officials said.

Multinational corporations have long been in the sights of European Union authorities because of the way they can reduce their tax bills by basing themselves in low-tax centres or negotiating special deals with governments.

The EU executive will propose new measures on Jan. 27, EU commissioner Pierre Moscovici told European lawmakers on Monday.

Some of the new proposals will oblige EU countries to accept as binding a set of voluntary guidelines, known as BEPS, which aim to close gaps in existing international tax rules, an EU official said on Tuesday.

The official said the Commission would propose that the 28 EU states turn some of the BEPS guidelines - which were backed by leaders of the G20 group of the world's largest economies - into binding legislation.

Interest deductions applied by multinationals are among the areas where the Commission plans to go beyond BEPS. The guidelines already recommend corporations link deductions to the economic activities of each group entity, rather than shifting debt among national branches, officials said.

Moscovici told EU lawmakers on Monday he plans to propose stricter rules on taxes applicable to controlled foreign companies and on hybrid financial products which may avoid taxation because of their complexity.

The Commission proposals will follow a crackdown on deals some multinationals have made with individual EU states, which are seen as damaging competition.

On Monday, the EU Executive ordered Belgium to recover 700 million euros (529 million pounds) from 35 large companies in taxes not paid because of a model that gave multinationals a more preferential treatment than smaller firms.

In October, the Commission ruled that Starbucks Corp. (SBUX.O) and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCHA.MI) benefited from illegal tax deals with the Dutch and Luxembourg authorities and ordered each country to recover 20-30 million euros in back taxes. Brussels is also investigating the tax arrangements of Amazon (AMZN.O) in Luxembourg and Apple (AAPL.O) in Ireland.

To avoid such deals in the future, European Union finance ministers agreed in October to automatically exchange information on agreements struck with multinational companies from 2017.

The package to be proposed on Jan. 27 will also include measures to make company tax declarations more transparent and may go as far as obliging them to make their tax bills public.
 
I was in Luxembourg recently. One of the tour guides for one of the places was quite sad actually, she practically begged everyone to tell their friends how nice the city was to increase tourism because they were losing so much in the financial/business sector.
 
80deg16minW - 12/1/2016 21:10

Where will they move to next?

I attended a presentation last week and the big 'new' thing was moving your corporate centres to either China or Russia and wait for it or Venezuela!
 
ahx00 - 13/1/2016 07:56

I was in Luxembourg recently. One of the tour guides for one of the places was quite sad actually, she practically begged everyone to tell their friends how nice the city was to increase tourism because they were losing so much in the financial/business sector.

They're getting hit hard by the new banking transparency rules and people/corporations are moving their legal entities and closing their off-shore accounts at a rate of knots - the EU will be paying them massive subsidies within 3 years just to keep them afloat.
 
Also, i'm obliged to tell you all that Luxembourg is actually lovely. Genuinely.
They had a great museum. It's the first time i've ever been to a truly great museum and practically had the entire place to myself. It was eery and very, very nice.
 
ahx00 - 13/1/2016 10:19

Also, i'm obliged to tell you all that Luxembourg is actually lovely. Genuinely.
They had a great museum. It's the first time i've ever been to a truly great museum and practically had the entire place to myself. It was eery and very, very nice.

I had a similar experience in the first district in Vienna recently - I'd travelled/worked in Vienna many times over the years, but never bothered to do the tourist bit, but did so this time just before xmas as the wife wanted to do some xmas shopping - anyway did the whole district and it was a great tourist trip - but the places were all nearly empty - so was a strange experience, I can only think that a lot of people are wary of doing these types of trips due to recent terrorist incidents?
 
Apparently a lot of the people 'in' Luxembourg commute from neighbouring countries, so in the summer period the only people there are those who work in tourist types of trade, or other full time Luxembourgians.

It was strange how dead the place was. Entire, beautiful, scenic squares with cafes all around that would be full to bursting in most European cities... completely deserted.