MMS - Quantum Leap in Healing Disease
- Thread starter TuBBz
- Start date
HeathfieldRoad1874
Miserable Sod
Do you think that no good at all has come from Pharmaceutical Companies? Or that we would be better off without them completely?
The net effect has been positive, so to tar so many with the same brush is erroneous.
The CEO might have profits at the front of their minds, but all scientists want to do is further our knowledge.
The Fear
A Wise Man (once sat next to him)
There you go my friend, putting words in my mouth.
Of course they've done good, driven by profit of course. I just felt your post was overstating the good of the scientists.
It seems to be you extrapolating that to me tarring them all with the same brush.
There are others in different fields that also want to further knowledge. Many scientists may be looking to further knowledge, but many are doing it as a job, like people in many walks of life, it's not always about furthering knowledge, it is a living and they work for very profit driven companies, companies that won't look at alternatives to drugs.
I was talking about pharma as per your post by the way, you've expanded it out.
Of course they've done good, driven by profit of course. I just felt your post was overstating the good of the scientists.
It seems to be you extrapolating that to me tarring them all with the same brush.
There are others in different fields that also want to further knowledge. Many scientists may be looking to further knowledge, but many are doing it as a job, like people in many walks of life, it's not always about furthering knowledge, it is a living and they work for very profit driven companies, companies that won't look at alternatives to drugs.
I was talking about pharma as per your post by the way, you've expanded it out.
HeathfieldRoad1874
Miserable Sod
I must have got confused. You took my quote about scientists and tore it apart, hence my conclusion.
I agree, many are just in it as a job. It's a necessity of life that we need to earn a living. Getting into their field in the first place is usually a vocation, though. If it's misused by their masters, then I have to defend them in their work, still. Many are on relatively low salaries, and with scientific funding from Government being so low, they have very little choice.
I strongly believe their motives are still good.
I agree, many are just in it as a job. It's a necessity of life that we need to earn a living. Getting into their field in the first place is usually a vocation, though. If it's misused by their masters, then I have to defend them in their work, still. Many are on relatively low salaries, and with scientific funding from Government being so low, they have very little choice.
I strongly believe their motives are still good.
The Fear
A Wise Man (once sat next to him)
I didn't tare it apart, I said I thought your opinion on the pharma companies was overstarted. It was just a view mate. I don't trust them. I don't trust many big industry heads and their manipulation of us all for profits not for good. As said, I put the food (sorry, 'food') industry high on that list as well.
HeathfieldRoad1874
Miserable Sod
The point of my post was to separate big pharma and the scientists, so maybe we're both arguing the same point?
I deliberately understated how bad big pharma has been for effect. I see you've taken it literally, which I can understand given the medium we are communicating in.
And yes, the food industry has created a huge problem now. I have to be on constant guard against some of the crap in food, as it affects me badly. I still reckon that the scientists creating aspartame etc thought they were doing good. There is too much sugar in our diets, and cutting it is an honourable goal. Where they fall down is on the testing. Not long enough is given to determining the effects of such drugs.
I deliberately understated how bad big pharma has been for effect. I see you've taken it literally, which I can understand given the medium we are communicating in.
And yes, the food industry has created a huge problem now. I have to be on constant guard against some of the crap in food, as it affects me badly. I still reckon that the scientists creating aspartame etc thought they were doing good. There is too much sugar in our diets, and cutting it is an honourable goal. Where they fall down is on the testing. Not long enough is given to determining the effects of such drugs.
HeathfieldRoad1874
Miserable Sod
:19: :19: :19:
Touche.
HeathfieldRoad1874
Miserable Sod
I've already got one funeral to go to soon, don't make it a second. That stuff is pure poison.
G
Guest
Guest
Cbd oil should be made avalible free to anyone that needs it. That would be helpful to millions
BringbakMON
Vital Football Hero
spot on sasquat
combine that with the dilute bleach, some healing hands magic and maybe the natural goodness of sunny D and the world could be taught to sing in perfect harmony fo sure
(then we could shut down evil big pharma and get rid of all those nasty drugs they've developed)
:38:
combine that with the dilute bleach, some healing hands magic and maybe the natural goodness of sunny D and the world could be taught to sing in perfect harmony fo sure
(then we could shut down evil big pharma and get rid of all those nasty drugs they've developed)
:38:
G
Guest
Guest
The whole point is to cure us and give us the best treatment. Not to run a profitable business on our healths expense. What's wrong with this world!! Money is all people think about!
HeathfieldRoad1874
Miserable Sod
Bleach kills you.
TuBBz
Are You Local?
Bleach may very well do so but did you watch any of the documentary?
Or did you just google MMS and stumble across articles/disinformation and decide once again to follow the mainstream view?
If you had watched it then you would know that the chemical compound changes once you add the citric acid to Chlorine dioxide
Now as a scientist I would expect you to know that it is not a bleach, instead, you are spreading your bullshit pseudo science again, claiming to be the font of knowledge
Every single chemical known to man can be poisonous when taken in too large of quantities. people can die drinking too much water.
Ninety five percent of the medicines known to man are extremely poisonous when used in large quantities. About 15 aspirins can kill a person. One-half of a cup of most of the chemicals under your sink would kill a person.
I am very very sorry that no scientist or scientific laboratory has ever written up and signed a scientific paper stating that MMS is not a bleach. The fact is, no laboratory ever thought that it would be necessary to come out and say that.
It never occurred to any of them that someone would be dumb enough to start calling dilute solutions of chlorine dioxide a bleach. (Industrial strength Chlorine dioxide solutions has absolutely nothing to do with MMS.) MMS is only a few drops of Chlorine dioxide (or even just Sodium chlorite) diluted in plenty of water – it simply does not have the potential to bleach anything at all.
That is ridiculous - to push the idea that MMS is a bleach, as no one has ever used MMS for a bleach.
Or did you just google MMS and stumble across articles/disinformation and decide once again to follow the mainstream view?
If you had watched it then you would know that the chemical compound changes once you add the citric acid to Chlorine dioxide
Now as a scientist I would expect you to know that it is not a bleach, instead, you are spreading your bullshit pseudo science again, claiming to be the font of knowledge
Every single chemical known to man can be poisonous when taken in too large of quantities. people can die drinking too much water.
Ninety five percent of the medicines known to man are extremely poisonous when used in large quantities. About 15 aspirins can kill a person. One-half of a cup of most of the chemicals under your sink would kill a person.
I am very very sorry that no scientist or scientific laboratory has ever written up and signed a scientific paper stating that MMS is not a bleach. The fact is, no laboratory ever thought that it would be necessary to come out and say that.
It never occurred to any of them that someone would be dumb enough to start calling dilute solutions of chlorine dioxide a bleach. (Industrial strength Chlorine dioxide solutions has absolutely nothing to do with MMS.) MMS is only a few drops of Chlorine dioxide (or even just Sodium chlorite) diluted in plenty of water – it simply does not have the potential to bleach anything at all.
That is ridiculous - to push the idea that MMS is a bleach, as no one has ever used MMS for a bleach.
HeathfieldRoad1874
Miserable Sod
Chlorine dioxide IS a bleach. You see, they’re clever here. When denying the whole bleach thing, they say ‘MMS is not bleach’ (true), not ‘CDS is not bleach’ (which would be false). Chlorine dioxide is a strong oxidising agent and under EU classification it’s described as very toxic, corrosive and damaging to the environment.
TuBBz
Are You Local?
lol, what is your actual agenda? are you just an argumentative person who likes to have opposing views or are you actually paid by the state to spread lies and BS?
Proof that FDA does not consider chlorine dioxide poisonous
Obviously, if the FDA approves of the use of Chlorine dioxide on food, it does not consider Chlorine dioxide to be poisonous. See below:
21 C.F.R. § 173.300 Chlorine dioxide.
Title 21 - Food and Drugs I have quoted the FDA regulation here in a few sentences, but if you want to read more, just put the 21 C.F.R. and numbers in the search engine, Google or others, and you can read it all. Keep in mind that Acidified Sodium chlorite produces chlorine dioxide.
21 .C.F.R § 173.300 Chlorine dioxide.
Chlorine dioxide (CAS Reg. No. 10049–04–4) may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions:
21 C.F.R. 173.325 Acidified sodium chlorite solutions.
CHAPTER I: FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) SUBCHAPTER B: FOOD FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION (CONTINUED) PART 173: SECONDARY DIRECT FOOD ADDITIVES PERMITTED IN FOOD FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION Subpart D: Specific Usage Additives 173.325 - Acidified sodium chlorite solutions. Acidified sodium chlorite solutions may be safely used in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: READ MORE BY GOING TO THE INTERNET AND PUTTING THE C.F.R. § 73.300 NUMBER INTO GOOGLE.
21 C.F.R. § 173.300 Chlorine dioxide. Title 21 - Food and Drugs I have quoted the FDA regulation here in a few sentences, but if you want to read more, just put the 21 C.F.R. and numbers in the search engine, Google or others, and you can read it all. Keep in mind that Acidified Sodium chlorite produces chlorine dioxide. Title 21: Food and Drugs • PART 173—SECONDARY DIRECT FOOD ADDITIVES PERMITTED IN FOOD FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION (backup mirror) • Subpart D—Specific Usage Additives
Proof that FDA does not consider chlorine dioxide poisonous
Obviously, if the FDA approves of the use of Chlorine dioxide on food, it does not consider Chlorine dioxide to be poisonous. See below:
21 C.F.R. § 173.300 Chlorine dioxide.
Title 21 - Food and Drugs I have quoted the FDA regulation here in a few sentences, but if you want to read more, just put the 21 C.F.R. and numbers in the search engine, Google or others, and you can read it all. Keep in mind that Acidified Sodium chlorite produces chlorine dioxide.
21 .C.F.R § 173.300 Chlorine dioxide.
Chlorine dioxide (CAS Reg. No. 10049–04–4) may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions:
21 C.F.R. 173.325 Acidified sodium chlorite solutions.
CHAPTER I: FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) SUBCHAPTER B: FOOD FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION (CONTINUED) PART 173: SECONDARY DIRECT FOOD ADDITIVES PERMITTED IN FOOD FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION Subpart D: Specific Usage Additives 173.325 - Acidified sodium chlorite solutions. Acidified sodium chlorite solutions may be safely used in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: READ MORE BY GOING TO THE INTERNET AND PUTTING THE C.F.R. § 73.300 NUMBER INTO GOOGLE.
21 C.F.R. § 173.300 Chlorine dioxide. Title 21 - Food and Drugs I have quoted the FDA regulation here in a few sentences, but if you want to read more, just put the 21 C.F.R. and numbers in the search engine, Google or others, and you can read it all. Keep in mind that Acidified Sodium chlorite produces chlorine dioxide. Title 21: Food and Drugs • PART 173—SECONDARY DIRECT FOOD ADDITIVES PERMITTED IN FOOD FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION (backup mirror) • Subpart D—Specific Usage Additives
