Strett
Vital Champions League
Freeloaders.You can see the bats flitting about under the floodlights on match nights. They've been attending evening kick-offs for a couple of decades at least.
Freeloaders.You can see the bats flitting about under the floodlights on match nights. They've been attending evening kick-offs for a couple of decades at least.
Freeloaders.
Here's an idea...if the rebuild has an ecological twist and one where protecting a threatened species is paramount, we fund that via the stadium's naming.
That the pipistrelle is noted, and we're gonna play soccer, why not...
Batsball ground? I think it has a ring to it.
Chaps? Chaps.
Well said, and quite apt.Maybe nuno could be the batman and EM commissioner Gordon.
You really think so?The NFFC guru re the PT extension has provided another insightful update; worth having a peruse.
I think some of their info, actually, stems from the current consultation they're working on (its not directly linked, but probably adjacent, at least from a planning perspective).
Not Danny Taylor level of detail, but certainly v interesting.
TBH, it reads as if the poster either works for NFFC or RBC, IMO.You really think so?
Do you have a link?The NFFC guru re the PT extension has provided another insightful update; worth having a peruse.
I think some of their info, actually, stems from the current consultation they're working on (its not directly linked, but probably adjacent, at least from a planning perspective).
Not Danny Taylor level of detail, but certainly v interesting.
It's just another of his very, very, very long posts.Do you have a link?
You're not wrong, pointless red tape and political machinations is what is holding back this, much needed, super huge development.It’s all a bit dull and exceedingly boring now. Where are the plans to develop the stadium beyond the PT stand?
Have we submitted new plans for the PT stand and Bridgeford to make them bigger in our push towards EMs 50k seater stadium wish?
If so, where are the drawings?
What’s the plan for the BC as without that being redeveloped we can’t get near the 50k
It’s beyond tedious now. 7 years later trying to develop 1 stand and all this BS red tape.
Was any consideration ever given to buying the rugby club land and making plans to combine our site and that site into a new multi purpose development for both teams?
Anymore delays and we might as well look for a new site as at this rate it will 2035 before anything is completed
I think he works for Laing O Rourke'sTBH, it reads as if the poster either works for NFFC or RBC, IMO.
Think back to the unveiling of the proposed new PT stand; the plans were the last thing to be made public; you can be sure that will be the case for the rest of the ground.It’s all a bit dull and exceedingly boring now. Where are the plans to develop the stadium beyond the PT stand?
Have we submitted new plans for the PT stand and Bridgeford to make them bigger in our push towards EMs 50k seater stadium wish?
If so, where are the drawings?
What’s the plan for the BC as without that being redeveloped we can’t get near the 50k
It’s beyond tedious now. 7 years later trying to develop 1 stand and all this BS red tape.
Was any consideration ever given to buying the rugby club land and making plans to combine our site and that site into a new multi purpose development for both teams?
Anymore delays and we might as well look for a new site as at this rate it will 2035 before anything is completed
Indeed, either way s/he is certainly ITK.I think he works for Laing O Rourke's
Anybody who posts on line that joining the Bridgeford stand with a new PT stand is a virtual impossibility almost certainly doesn't work for a contractor , so you can rule that out.I think he works for Laing O Rourke's
Havent read that yet, but will do later. Not a very impressive stand at Fulham, or very big. I think behind the stand the facilities are excellent, but when I was there last season I thought it was good, but unremarkableThink back to the unveiling of the proposed new PT stand; the plans were the last thing to be made public; you can be sure that will be the case for the rest of the ground.
Reading the DT article, the only new news in that lot was the bit about how long it took Fulham to build their stand, and the comparison he drew with the delays in both projects.
Why?Anybody who posts on line that joining the Bridgeford stand with a new PT stand is a virtual impossibility almost certainly doesn't work for a contractor , so you can rule that out.
No idea but he is in the know . Apparently.Why?
Why wouldn't that be part of the original planning and drawings? In order to maximise capacity, you would think this is the most obvious solution, and therefore have architects create a vision delivering this?
I can see the issue at the opposite end, but creating a 'horseshoe' design for the 3 stands is possible. Even if it means amending the PT design so this can be accomplished