Hopefully Macc will appeal on the basis that they haven't been dealt with in the same way as Bolton resulting in Wanderers getting their deserved punishment for refusing to play twice
Hopefully Macc will appeal on the basis that they haven't been dealt with in the same way as Bolton resulting in Wanderers getting their deserved punishment for refusing to play twice
The full story is that Macclesfield have had 6 points deducted with a further 4 points deduction suspended. This is following an Independent Disciplinary Committee hearing.
Well hopefully.
Still doesn't explain why Macclesfield do receive the entirely correct punishment and are dealt with in 10 days or so, whereas Bolton's worse offences are ignored totally for many months and then they receive an effective zero punishment from the same EFL. It all makes no sense whatsoever
Well hopefully.
Still doesn't explain why Macclesfield do receive the entirely correct punishment and are dealt with in 10 days or so, whereas Bolton's worse offences are ignored totally for many months and then they receive an effective zero punishment from the same EFL. It all makes no sense whatsoever
The once great game of football is in a right two and eight . One word ......money imo. Some have to much , some not enough . More a business not a sport.
If that is the case it's a quite clear conflict of interest. Any direct involvement in these cases - they are all related, they all impact on Notlob - or any indirect lobbying is a clear breach of his professional code of conduct, which the SRA should be acting upon with a likelihood of him being struck off.
Mentioning Bolton, I see they have sorted things out with FGR regarding Doidge. Also, that Doidge won some sort of player of the month award in the SPL.